|
此文章由 leonar 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 leonar 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
katherman 发表于 2019-7-14 16:52 
active没有太多价值吧
以后passive的规模还会更大
en en 楼上说的对 active 日子越发艰难.........
In 2018 in the US, passive index funds (including unlisted mutual (managed) funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)) enjoyed a net inflow of US$431 billion, while active mutual funds experienced net outflows of $418 billion, as shown below. Given the large fee difference, that represents a loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in fees to the asset management industry. It’s also become widely-accepted wisdom that most active managers do not beat the index.
In Deloitte’s 2019 Investment Management Outlook, 16 of the top 20 global funds by net flows were passive mutual funds and ETFs, gathering a net US$143 billion. |
|