The Hunger Games

doubleseven

原帖由 patrickzhu 于 2012-3-29 22:00 发表

说明老猫很年轻。
Twilight除了女孩们看之外，据说另外一个主力人群就是中年妇女，呵呵。

俺也不喜欢twilight。好像对这种类型的片子都完全没兴趣，包括魔戒，哈利波特什么的。
当时觉得还是要赶赶潮流去影院看魔戒，结果结结实实地睡着了。

Onmyway

It's the lastest craze, ever since twilight and Harry Potter, but in my opinion it'll never be as good as the book. Even though the movie is famous, only the book can really show the audience what it's about. The movie is just kind of assuming you know everything about the plot already. It was good, but it's not famous for that. Avatar or Hugo was famous because the movie was awesome, with it's camerawork and special lightings and effects. The HUnger Games movie was only good in people's eyes, because the book was famous. THe plot was famous, the author was famous, the movie was just an addition.

The movie overall was great and intriguging, but some parts were a bit weird, or rushed. Like how in the book, Madge (the mayor's daughter) gives Katniss the mockingjay pin, whereas in the movie, Katniss buys the pin and gives it to Prim, who then gives it back for good luck. I know that lots of people where kind of disappointed in this, as it didn't really have a big meaning anymore. THe special effects in the movie were great, because Katniss and Peeta really were and fire, and when they held their hands up, it gave you a feeling of sastifaction. In her interview with Caeser Flickerman, her red dress also seemed to catch on fire.

The movie was gory, but not horror film gory, just blood and cracking of bones. One of the creepist parts was when Katniss set the tracker - jackers onto GLimmer. Glimmer couldn't escape, and got the deadly stings. It scene shows her face, arms and legs, covered with black and blue bites, swelled up and pale. Another would be when Thresh cracks Clove's head on the Cornucopia, where a real crack was head, as she dropped to the ground.
The cornucopia kind of diappointed me, as it wasn't really a majestic golden horn, it was more like pieces of scrap metal built together into a bad spiral object. It didn't look very convincing.

Overall, the movie was great, and all the characters were believable especially Rue in the film. I really enjoyed watching it for 2 hours, and I really hope all of you get the chance to see it.

kane321

2个半小时，1个多小时前奏，真开始了，也就那么回事，比较适合青少年看到是的，大部分人死的都是怎么死的都不知道，有只闻其声的，有开始瞬间死的。。。 大篇幅都在讲情感友谊，连侧重生存上的东西也没啥。和大逃杀完全不是一个类新的片子
票房大都是沾了小说的光，等全面上映结束的时候，IMDB的评分应该在7-7.5左右了。
估计是口味不适合我

[ 本帖最后由 kane321 于 2012-4-2 08:35 编辑 ]

waterer

原帖由 asmilesnail 于 2012-3-28 11:00 发表
太平淡了，还以为结局是女主角把身上的追踪器挖出来了，然后跑出去把那些主持这个节目的人都统统干掉了

--- 拜托，这根本就不是最终的结局啊。
    一共3本书啊，虽然没有twilight 那么厚，可也不止这第一步这么少啊。

waterer

原帖由 juliez 于 2012-3-28 11:55 发表
还是更喜欢读书，书带来的悬念和期待电影没有完全做到。另外有些改编也不知道为什么，比如电影的第一幕，妹妹的噩梦是在 Katniss的安慰而不是妈妈，是Rue建议她割蜂窝不是她自己。不过影像的东西可以让画面生动起来，比如我就没想过capitol的人服装可以那么色彩亮丽，跟开party一样。最后追杀的动物可以那样被drag and paste进去。

---- 我觉得这本书能拍成这样已经很不错了。
     毕竟看书的时候，很多东西都是根据自己的想象来的，想象是可以无边无际的。
     但是拍称电影以后就实际话很多了。

老猫晒太阳

现在还有7.8呢

喵了个咪

去看了，还行吧，不算特别的好看，就像大家说的，前奏太长了。。

kane321

原帖由 老猫晒太阳 于 2012-4-8 11:51 发表
现在还有7.8呢

7.7了，3.22上映，等上半年吧，呵呵，好多片子刚出来时都分挺高的
不过真好看的片子基本很久都一样高分

esamanda

电影是显得无聊了些。我看的那场还有人半场就离开了。书的内容比电影好些。

老猫晒太阳

都叫着不好看，这数据怎么来的。-____-b

Nation/Territory
(click to view)        #1 Movie        #1 Movie
Wknd Gross
ARGENTINA        Wrath of the Titans        $1,298,817
AUSTRALIA        The Hunger Games        $5,009,074

老猫晒太阳

原帖由 kane321 于 2012-4-8 11:58 发表

7.7了，3.22上映，等上半年吧，呵呵，好多片子刚出来时都分挺高的
不过真好看的片子基本很久都一样高分

基本上IMDb上，>7.0的片子都是不错的片子，>7.5的都是好片子。
连奥斯卡电影都是8.0左右。

wdmznzd

看电影，和觉得是不是好片子真的要这麽在乎这个IMDB的评分吗？

老猫晒太阳

不是闲着磨磨嘴皮么。

odds

书更好看, 3部,从去年就开始期待电影了.

不觉得前奏长,因为交待的基础,从而奠定了未来“哪里有压迫,哪里就有反抗的基调“.

基本上, hunger games 是政府为了向各区施加高压统治的一个手段。

ltevil

貌似8错

Devil_Star

看完还是觉得没有“大逃杀”来得有感觉～

erica8113

听很多人都说好看啊，期待。。。。

Qiuqian

原帖由 thief 于 2012-3-25 19:35 发表
蛮好看的，我觉得没有爱情产生，都是为了生存做得秀。

我怎么觉得那个男主真心喜欢女主呢？

Qiuqian

原帖由 asmilesnail 于 2012-3-28 11:00 发表
太平淡了，还以为结局是女主角把身上的追踪器挖出来了，然后跑出去把那些主持这个节目的人都统统干掉了

结尾时两个人在火车上的话，使得结尾不平淡呀

成吉思汗

看上去不错'

floraz

没看过书
我倒觉得看电影下来就感情纠结部分印象最深