|
发表于 2019-5-17 22:41
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 曲晨 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 曲晨 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
ons for decision
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and (b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, I find that you have not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in China that would be sufficient incentive for you to return to China.
More specifically, I have considered your economic circumstances and note that you have provided some evidence of your financial standing, however the amounts/assets cannot
be considered significant in the context of overall economic conditions and cost of living in China. As such, I do not consider that you have strong economic incentives to return China at the end of your proposed stay in Australia.
In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day it was transmitted.
Questions about this decision
We cannot consider your visa application any further. |
|