|
|
此文章由 bb33 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 bb33 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
这个肯定可以搞的
首先花钱找个专家证人把超的速度搞到10km/h以下，然后再用那个什么几年干净记录去搞
有钱真的省心啊
Challenging the speed alleged - radar/lidar detected
Speed radar/lidars do not always give an accurate reading. Like most scientific instruments, radars and lidars are not infallible. In other words, although they are generally reliable, they are not perfect and can give inaccurate measurements.
If a radar/lidar has for instance not been properly maintained or calibrated, it can give an inaccurate reading. Further, if the speed measuring device is not used correctly by the police officer or the conditions are not ideal for the use of the device at the time of the alleged offence, again, it can give an inaccurate reading.
To be able to properly challenge the reading on a radar/lidar device, it is almost always necessary to obtain a report from an expert in the field. This can be a costly exercise.
Successfully lowering the category of offence
Where it might be a little difficult for a Magistrate to accept that you were not travelling in excess of the speed limit, often, a Magistrate will be able to accept that although speeding, you were at least travelling at a speed lower than has been alleged.
This is important when challenging an offence of travelling in excess of 30km/h or 45km/h over the limit.
If a Magistrate is not satisfied on the evidence that you were travelling at the speed alleged but still finds that you were speeding, they can find you guilty of a lesser offence. For instance, they can find you not guilty of exceeding the speed limit by more than 30km/h but instead guilty of travelling in excess of 15km/h. This would mean that the mandatory 3 month disqualification period would be avoided.
https://www.primelawyers.com.au/ ... eat-a-speeding-fine |
|
人生不来一次痛快的打架,是多么的遗憾. (2009-5-29) 仰望星空 
发表于 2017-5-3 20:27
平时开的都不快的
发表于 2017-5-4 18:45
