新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 主妇的HPT体验 (2008-7-24) hero妈 · 西式红酒黑胡椒羊排,附简单做法。 (2010-1-17) madling
· 难忘一刻-过大年 (2005-2-7) ewsd · 不算经验,只是经历。。---Cindy Kindy毕业回顾,妈妈们,你们大可不必太焦虑。 (2010-1-20) chinara
Advertisement
Advertisement
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主:encoding

让孩子们快乐些! [复制链接]

退役斑竹 2007 年度奖章获得者 2008年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 2012年度奖章获得者 2009年度奖章获得者 2010年度奖章获得者 2014年度奖章获得者 2015年度奖章获得者

发表于 2011-3-11 20:19 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 patrickzhu 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 patrickzhu 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 SMART1968 于 2011-3-11 18:21 发表
如果自由党上台后取消oc班,那悉尼还会有补习班吗?如果自由党上台后精英中学划分地区那华人聚居的房价会怎样?


2002年的时候有过一次提出要取消大部分的精英中学设置(包括JR),只留下7个老牌子。而OC班设置四年内砍掉一半。当时NSW的教育部长也支持,但是后来就不了了之。

回顾一下历史,当时SMH的报道

Axe hovers over selective high schools
By Gerard Noonan, Education Editor
July 24 2002

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/23/1027332378883.html

NSW's extensive selective high school system should be progressively dismantled to leave only the seven longest-established selective high schools in Sydney, says a landmark review of public education.

Opportunity classes in primary schools should also be phased out, with the numbers halved over the next four years.

The inquiry, chaired by the University of NSW's Tony Vinson, released its latest report yesterday, recommending extensive and systemic change within public schools.

It also hit out at "appalling" conditions in some schools, arguing that the Government would need to spend large sums for at least a decade to remove ageing and decrepit classrooms.

"In so many instances the fabric of the public schools is simply unworthy of what is being attempted within them and fails to honour our society's obligation to its children," Professor Vinson said.

The seven selective high schools that would remain under the Vinson plan are Fort Street, North Sydney Boys', North Sydney Girls', Sydney Boys', Sydney Girls', Sydney Technical and St George Girls'.

All others, including NSW's best performer in the HSC, James Ruse Agricultural High, would become partially selective from 2006.

"This would involve accepting up to half their students from their local communities, not based on a selective test," Professor Vinson said.

The inquiry also proposes that the selective high school test be changed from next year to test a wider range of talents than is currently assessed. "The inquiry's view is that the test should include two new elements, a writing component (as currently proposed) and a creativity component to test divergent thinking," the report notes.

"To ensure that students from non-English speaking and socially disadvantaged backgrounds are treated equitably, it is further recommended that the creativity test be as far as possible non-verbal, and that students applying to selective schools be able to count their best four of five test areas in their overall mark."

Professor Vinson argues that, wherever possible, talented students should be able to remain within mainstream schools to maximise social cohesion and "an inclusive school community".

The inquiry has visited more than 150 schools. It is being funded partly by the Parents & Citizens Association and the NSW Teachers Federation. It has the apparent strong support of the NSW Education Minister, John Watkins.

Last night, he welcomed the report, saying the future of public education lay in the revitalisation of comprehensive high schools. "There is nothing inconsistent in the Vinson report in this regard."

Earlier this month, he told the Herald he planned no further changes to public schools until a newly formed public education committee had examined Professor Vinson's conclusions. That committee met for the first time this week. He also put further multi-campus colleges on hold and said he saw no need for more single-sex or selective schools.

Mr Watkins said a statement of principles outlined in the report "could provide a guiding light to lead public education into the next decade". These included giving priority to keeping local, comprehensive, year 7 to 12 schools, and addressing the problems some face by allocating adequate buildings, equipment and staff.

The report says that over the next two years, all schools should set up academic extension working parties. These would help identify able students suitable for extension work.

It also calls for a halt to the establishment of new senior colleges for pupils in years 11 and 12.
Advertisement
Advertisement

退役斑竹 2012年度奖章获得者 2009年度奖章获得者

发表于 2011-3-11 20:27 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 缓缓 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 缓缓 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
如果只保留7家,那大家要打破头抢位子了!

发表于 2011-3-12 12:03 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 飘啊飘 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 飘啊飘 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 epaweh 于 2011-3-11 20:15 发表
听说VCE的一对一补习都需60-80元/hr  ,如果每门都补的话,  总计下来相信费用也不菲.
不过,你朋友的女儿补得太值了--------- 从成绩一般补至读医科,绝对是奇迹。

奇迹加神话!

发表于 2011-3-12 13:46 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 童心的魔镜 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 童心的魔镜 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
喜欢这样一轮一轮的周旋类似话题, 不求结论, 就是从中刺激下自己近似倦怠的神经系统,努力做个负责的焦虑的妈妈
相信每个妈妈都是希望孩子快乐着学习着的, 就看如果找到这个平衡点, 只顾快乐或只顾学习都是不可取的.....说法比较中庸,没办法自己一直就是一个力求中庸之道的人.
.

发表于 2011-3-12 15:10 |显示全部楼层

回复 epaweh 60# 帖子

此文章由 水姜花 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 水姜花 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
所以说,爹妈也大吃一惊,没想到女儿考的这么好,不过他们补习用了近1万多元澳币呢。换算到悉尼从3年级开始进行补习奋战OC,到最好考完大学,费用远远超过了这个价。
孩子她妈说,这孩子原来就是混吃等死的主,成绩始终就是中不溜,原来在国内我们是住一个小区,她弟弟跟我儿子是幼儿园同学,只要我们带孩子在下面玩,她总是穿着溜冰鞋在那玩,她妈就说,回澳洲高考也不知道会怎样呢,一点课外作业都不做。12年级的时候突然跟她妈说要钱付补习老师的费用,老师是自己找的,自那以后每天学习到12点以后,这样大概持续了9-10个月的样子。我朋友说看到女儿后来积极主动学习的样子都不敢相信,整整9个多月家里禁止儿子发出任何噪音,妈妈完全跟这女儿的作息在走,儿子一直就被爸爸带到外面:图书馆,公园,超市,商店。。。。。反正只要别吵着姐姐就好。
女儿有天还问:怎么最近弟弟很忙吗,家里都听不到他的声音了。。。
最后结论就是------小姑娘在最佳的时间开窍了,然后用了最有效率的方法达到了目的,皆大欢喜。

[ 本帖最后由 水姜花 于 2011-3-12 16:13 编辑 ]

发表于 2011-3-12 18:37 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 aunz2009 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 aunz2009 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 sarahliang 于 2011-3-10 20:08 发表

刚刚买了2009 年的 ICAS PAPER A, 才知道同一PAPER A, AUSTRALIA 是YEAR 3, NEW ZEALAND 是YEAR 4, SINGAPORE YEAR 2.

SEE NEW ZEALAND YEAR 4 才是 SINGAPORE YEAR 2 的水平.

补习是因为, 这里的教育制度不好, Y ...


NewZealand 5岁就开始Year1相当这里的Kindy,Year4和澳洲Year3学生年龄是一样的,叫法不同,并非差一年水平。
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-3-13 21:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 躁躁 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 躁躁 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
跟看这个贴子有点不明白,好象所有的孩子都在学琴啊,到底学琴有啥好处,为了上私校还是精英中学加分呢?呵呵,我们原来听信授琴老师的话以为会考有加分才让孩子考小提琴,现在知道根本没加分都不想让他五月份考乐理了,白占时间。
还有个个都说会考前要补习,弄得我都怕怕了,孩子还有几个月会考,我们目前还没这个意识。去年问过他他说请补习不如自己捉摸,而且这个边远地区学校没排名,越看贴心里越没底了~~~~

发表于 2011-3-14 12:59 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 icelemontea 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 icelemontea 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
一个朋友的儿子在布市的普通中学考上了QUT的牙医。
我听了印象深刻, 不晓得是不是个特例?
悉尼一定要去精英中学才能考上牙医吗?

[ 本帖最后由 icelemontea 于 2011-3-14 17:16 编辑 ]

发表于 2011-3-14 13:48 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 zzn 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 zzn 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
悉尼大学的牙医是本科毕业才考的。所以只要大学成绩还不错就可以了,也不管本科是什么专业的,都能考。。入学考试当然很难,,当然也有专门的补习班的。

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部