新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· mario 美容升级大作战 (2010-11-9) 寻羊冒险记8382 · [心情日历 11月9日] 结伴去偷欢 (完成时) (2008-11-9) 飞儿
· 面【原创分享】- 更新完毕 (2016-10-19) eat1983 · 陈年旧事系列3 (2006-4-16) SuiYi
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 1645|回复: 7

参加征文:这是哪国的英文?- Ex gratia [复制链接]

发表于 2010-3-25 20:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 味曾汁茄子 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 味曾汁茄子 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Ex gratia: 来自拉丁语

多用于法律或商用,意思是 as a favour,by favour,就是不是被迫的,不是legally bound
第一次接触这个词是一次dispute中对方明明让步了,但信中写做出这个决定完全是 ex gratia,我暗自挑眉,anyway 结果最重要
在taxation或一些商贸关系中也会遇到
常有听说的比如 ex-gratia payment


这个是WIKI的链接:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_gratia

example:
Please be advised that this is offered on an ex gratia basis.

An ex gratia payment could be earnings (and therefore taxable in full) if it can be said to be ‘from' the employee's employment.

评分

参与人数 1积分 +30 收起 理由
管理员(bulaohu) + 30 管理员加分

查看全部评分

Advertisement
Advertisement

参与宝库编辑功臣

发表于 2010-3-25 20:31 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 bffbffbff 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 bffbffbff 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
裁员的时候听过这词 :)

退役斑竹

发表于 2010-3-26 16:44 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 floraz 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 floraz 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 bffbffbff 于 2010-3-25 20:31 发表
裁员的时候听过这词 :)

裁人?(paopaobing(45))
我若不坚强,谁替我坚强

发表于 2010-3-29 17:57 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 azurechris 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 azurechris 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
请问楼主,如何发音啊

[ 本帖最后由 azurechris 于 2010-3-29 18:00 编辑 ]

发表于 2010-3-29 17:59 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 azurechris 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 azurechris 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
搜了搜,是不是就是愿意给点钱,但是不代表承认己方有过失?

1 Definition: An ex-gratia payment in this context is a payment made to an individual in respect of loss or damage to personal property in a situation where the County Council accepts no liability for the loss or damage but is willing to make some reimbursement without accepting liability. Most commonly such payments are made to employees in respect of personal property (including clothing or personal items such as spectacles) damaged or lost accidentally. Ex gratia payments are not made in situations where the loss is fully insured, either by the individual or the County Council

2. Funding: In the case of schools with delegated budgets, funding to make ex-gratia payments is included within the general delegated budget. There is no specific budget heading for this item as the payments concerned would normally be too small and infrequent to warrant specific provision. The decision as to whether or not to make an ex-gratia payment in individual cases rests with individual schools. Although this is not a matter for the Director of Education, in specific cases advice on practice may be sought from the County Council's Insurance Manager.

3. When to Consider Making an Ex Gratia Payment: Most claims are likely to be made by employees. These claims will normally relate to clothing or small personal items brought into school in the course of the working day. The loss or damage will normally be accidental. It does not have to be attributable to any fault or negligence on the part of the school and the making of an ex-gratia payment is not an admission of liability. Teachers' conditions of service (Appendix of the Burgundy Book) acknowledge that the school environment is one in which personal property might be subject to a greater than average risk of accidental loss or damage. They require schools to consider sympathetically any claims made by teachers in respect of loss or damage to property in the course of their job.

4. Making an Ex Gratia Payment: Ex gratia payments are intended to cover small losses. If a claim is made in respect of loss of more than £100 value, schools should seek advice from the insurance manager. If the object concerned is high in value, schools should consider whether or not is should have been brought into school in the first place, and whether it is or should be insured by the owner. Ex gratia payments are not intended to cover fair wear and tear. There should be evidence that the loss or damage is outside the usual areas such as spillage of food or drink, damage to vulnerable items of clothing, etc.

5. Motor Vehicles: The County Council does not accept any obligation to provide parking for employees' motor vehicles nor does it accept liability for loss or damage sustained while an employees vehicle is parked on County premises. The responsibility for insurance of a motor vehicle rests with the owner. Employees who use their vehicle on County business are required to have suitable insurance cover. Uninsured losses are (at least in principal) recoverable from any third party responsible for the damage. However, staff cars parked in school car parks may be at greater risk of suffering malicious damage by unknown persons and in such exceptional circumstances an ex-gratia payment may be appropriate. If, for instance, a school is satisfied that damage was caused maliciously in a way which relates to the teacher's (or other employee's) employment (e.g. by a pupil or parent) it should consider whether an ex-gratia payment is appropriate because the uninsured loss will not in practice be recoverable. The uninsured loss could include some compensation for loss of no-claims bonus or to help cover a reasonable excess in the employee's insurance policy.

6. Payments to People Who are Not Employees: In general ex-gratia payments will not be appropriate to people who are not employees. Contractors should have suitable insurance for themselves and their employees to cover such eventuality. Casual visitors such as parents or those attending school functions should not normally be considered unless there is clear fault on the part of the school, in which case the Insurance Manager should be consulted.. However, it may be reasonable to treat volunteers and school governors who have frequent business on school premises in the same way as employees.

7. Delegation: It is recommended that schools have a system which delegates to the headteacher the power to make occasional ex-gratia payments to employees - up to a specified amount of not more than (say) £100 on any one occasion and nor than a specified number of occasions in a year.

发表于 2010-3-29 18:52 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 lexton 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 lexton 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
在保险公司工作的时候经常遇到这种情况,例如客户A买了全年的旅游保险并在其中一次行程损失了财物,于是向保险公司提出索赔。保险公司在审理过程中发现该行程并非常规行程,与“保险除外”的条款相抵触,因此拒绝了索赔。于是中介(broker)就提出客户在出行前没有意识到此行程需要特别申报,但是愿意通过ex-gratia的方式来调解这个案子。也就是他们愿意为这个行程缴纳额外的保费,而保险公司也同时同意受理这个索赔。

觉得是保险公司为了留住客户的一种妥协,因为赔偿金额一定大于ex-gratia payment (不然客户也不会索赔了)。如果保险公司坚决不受理,结果就是客户马上走人咯。
Advertisement
Advertisement

退役斑竹

发表于 2010-3-29 20:32 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 floraz 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 floraz 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 azurechris 于 2010-3-29 17:57 发表
请问楼主,如何发音啊

我音标不好……(monkey13)
我是发 eks greiʃi:ə
我若不坚强,谁替我坚强

退役斑竹

发表于 2010-3-29 20:42 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 floraz 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 floraz 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
我觉得这个词是一种non admission的表示

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部