|
|
此文章由 Flyingfree 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Flyingfree 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 Flyingfree 于 2024-8-7 14:33 编辑
Khelif上诉胜了，林没有上诉但据称是IBA不接受其申请，这些都是前些天在中文网上查看到的。
你问了，我去翻英文资料，IBA的官方宣告则是说林没上诉，Khelif上诉了但在过程中自已取消了（并没有提前没交费用).
然后翻了ABC的报道，头更大了。。。一切都是个“谜”。。。。 还是存疑吧。。。天哪。。。
One sticking point for those making a case against both women is that the IBA claims Khelif "withdrew an appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), making the IBA decision legally binding" and Lin "did not appeal the IBA's decision".
The association's more recent statement claimed that the CAS "terminated the proceedings because the appellant did not pay the costs of the proceedings".
ABC NEWS Verify could find no evidence of a CAS appeal or a withdrawal from either Khelif or Lin.
BTW， IOC spokesman Mark Adams said last week that the IBA gave the Olympic body the results of the testing done on Khelif and Lin, but it was “so flawed that it was impossible to deal with.” 鉴于这两次测试都是由土耳其和印度完成的，我就想，就不能立马在法国给这两位马上做个测试？ |
|
南澳的25个最不同寻常的景点 (2013-9-30) pangpang 
楼主:dootbear
发表于 2024-8-7 13:00
