|
|
发表于 2020-6-22 21:26
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 Hetbert 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Hetbert 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 Hetbert 于 2020-6-22 20:52 编辑
Clojure 发表于 2020-6-22 15:20
在一家银行,但没有cross collateralisation (就是分成三个完全独立的loan),银行也会有权利任选拍卖吗 ...
对的。
所有的房贷合同,都有All Monies Clause, 只要欠银行的任何一种债务违约,你的所有抵押房产,不论有没有cross,银行都可以拿出来强拍,所有账户里的存款,都可以扣走,来弥补银行的损失。
其实这个条款还包括你在其它银行的存款和抵押品,但是即使违约,一个银行一般没办法强拍在另一家银行的抵押房产,也不能强扣在另一家银行的存款。除非这两家银行是一个集团的。你在westpac违约,把st George的房一起强拍了,也是没问题的。
WHAT IS AN “ALL MONEYS” CLAUSE IN SECURITY DOCUMENTS?
An “all moneys” clause is most commonly referred to in the context of a mortgage or charge. In that context, this type of clause means that all moneys owed to a lender are secured by the mortgage. Effectually, this means that the subject property under the mortgage or charge is security not only for the loans made under the mortgage or charge but also for any other secured and unsecured loans, such as a personal loan or credit card, made by the lender to the borrower.
The relevant clause in the original mortgage defined the total amount owing as:
“at any time, all money which one or more of you owe us, or will or may owe us in the future, including under this mortgage or any agreement covered by this mortgage”
What happens with multiple mortgages or guarantees?
In a situation where a borrower has multiple mortgages, if all are with the same lender, a default on any one of the mortgages can put the others at risk of falling within an “all moneys” clause.
However mortgages with other lenders will not fall within an “all moneys” clause.
Guarantors under loans can also be at risk – a guarantor could become liable for “all moneys” owed by the debtor, rather than only in relation to a specific guarantee.
这就是为什么房贷银行都愿意送信用卡,有了房贷后,信用卡债务从高风险的无抵押贷款变成了低风险的有抵押贷款,信用卡不仅利息高,还不怕你不还坏账。
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|