E10怎么样？

白菜

一直对E10有兴趣，今天查到了一些关于ford对E10的兼容性列表,  Ford除了：

1. Focus (2002 - 2004), F-series (1986-1992), Ka (All),
Mondeo 2.5l (pre-2001),Transit (1996 - 2004)

2. Capri (All), Courier 2.0L & 2.6L (All), Econovan (pre-2002),
Festiva (All), Laser 1.3L, 1.5L & 1.6L (All), Telstar (All)
Sierra (All), Escort (All)

的All models post 1986 except above车型对E10提供兼容，但是实际使用情况怎么样，是否对发动机有伤害？哪位知道请说一说，不为了口袋也为了环保阿

相关的文章在：http://www.ford.co.nz/servlet/Co ... p;qid=1178823083887

encoding

最近， NSW许多机构通过科学和驾驶测试证明:

用E10既不省钱又减少了动力和驾驶乐趣，而且长期对车也不好.何必还要犯傻呢？

千万不要加油时省了小钱（用E10）， 路上却化费了更多，因为不能燃烧充分，同样驾驶距离会燃烧更多油.

还不如用Premium unleaded，与E10花费差不多， 开起来还舒服有力，何乐而不为！若真要省小钱，则应加regular unleaded.



Does ethanol drive your dollar further? NO!!!

请看下列官方测试报告和视频:

http://media.drive.com.au/?rid=44514

http://www.drive.com.au/Editoria ... leID=59627&vf=1


Ethanol-blend fuels are about three cents a litre cheaper than regular unleaded at the pump but Drive found bills are higher overall because it burns less efficiently.

A fuel-efficiency showdown between the three most-popular types of petrol on the market concludes the ethanol blend will cost you more in the long run and may not even help the environment.

Around town using E10 was almost as expensive as using premium unleaded, despite the huge gap in pump prices. In the700 kilometres of city driving, our E10 Camry used almost 10 litres more fuel than our premium-fuel car.

The comparative fuel bills for the three cars were: E10, $105; premium, $105.91; and regular unleaded, $100.33.

[ 本帖最后由 encoding 于 2009-5-6 23:05 编辑 ]

2RCH

那v-power呢？

encoding

更适合于年代较新及引擎压缩比较高的车.

[ 本帖最后由 encoding 于 2009-5-7 21:27 编辑 ]