新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 关于钢笔 (2011-7-2) Yonny · 浮生六乐(外加一恨在第三页) (2005-3-18) sail
· 上山下乡考车记 (2005-12-17) 上山下乡 · 记录曾经的北欧印象-冬日的温暖片断 (2007-5-24) 蝶舞
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 655|回复: 5

Tax Cut Story [复制链接]

发表于 2006-5-10 12:32 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 大飞熊 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 大飞熊 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Here is the REAL story to lighten the Budget discussion! You've heard the cry from across Australia in the last couple of weeks: "It's just a tax cut for the rich!" - and then it's accepted as fact. But what does that statement really mean?

The following explanation may help.

Suppose that every night, ten men go out for dinner at La Porchetta's. The bill for all ten comes to $100. They decide to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, and it goes like this:

* The first four men (the poorest) paid nothing.

* The fifth paid $1.

* The sixth $3.

* The seventh $7.

* The eighth $12.

* The ninth $18.

* The tenth man (the richest) paid $59.

All 10 are quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner says: "Since you are all such good customers, I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."

So now their dinner for ten only costs $80.

The group still decides to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

The first four men are unaffected. They will still eat for free.

But how should the other six, the paying customers, divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share"?

They realise that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtract that from everybody's share, then the fifth and sixth men would each end up being paid to eat. The restaurateur suggests reducing each man's bill by roughly the same percentage, thus:

* The fifth man pays nothing (like the first four) instead of $1 (100%saving).

* The sixth pays $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).

* The seventh pays $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).

* The eighth pays $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).

* The ninth pays $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).

* The tenth pays $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six are better off, and the first four continue to eat for free, as now does the fifth - but outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man "but he got $10!"

"That's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men then surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner. The nine sat down and ate without him, but when they came to pay the bill, they discovered that they didn't have enough money between all of them to meet even half of the bill!

That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.
Advertisement
Advertisement

2007 年度奖章获得者 参与宝库编辑功臣 飞天奖章

发表于 2006-5-10 12:37 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 astina 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 astina 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
有道理.高税收制度确实让不少澳大利亚的PROFESSIONAL转去海外发展了

发表于 2006-5-10 12:39 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 西边雨 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 西边雨 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
哈哈

发表于 2006-5-10 12:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 西边雨 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 西边雨 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
按比例减的话,本来就是交税多的得益多。不可能倒过来的呀

发表于 2006-5-10 12:42 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 西边雨 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 西边雨 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
而且这个预算对有孩子的低收入家庭,对老人还是照顾的

发表于 2006-5-11 12:51 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 aruba 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 aruba 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
good story
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部