新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 80年代经典电视剧系列之港台新加坡篇 (2008-10-31) zmzhu · 新足迹读书半月谈(09.03上) —— 四大美女 (2009-4-1) 孔武
· 【Y叔家常便饭】---- 红豆奶油面包(有详细过程) (2013-7-15) Y叔 · 印度家常美食大全------- 菠菜羊肉/Spinach Lamb 10月25日 更新 (2008-10-3) 着我青衣永飘零
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 1252|回复: 2

Rental Property Advise [复制链接]

发表于 2008-8-8 16:53 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 shuangchao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 shuangchao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
It has come to my attention that some people have been advised by their accountant/tax agent that they can deduct rental property stamp duty over a period of five years. This is INCORRECT! If the accountant/tax agent indeed advised them this, then him/her is confusing stamp duty on purchase with borrowing cost.

Stamp duty on purchase should be capitalised, in another word, it forms as part of cost price of the property. it is NOT a deductible expense.

ATO keeps a close watch on rental property deduction, hence, please keep this in mind, do the right thing, seek a second opinion if necessary.

The following is a quick exercise to see how much you will saving by claiming stamp duty incorrectly:

let's say the stamp duty on an average house is $20000, incorrectly claimed over 5 years, means $4000 a year, roughly $1200 tax saving on average (depend on personal tax bracket of course), so $6000 in the pocket by the end of 5 years.
then say you sold the property at the end of 5 years, giving yourself an extra capital gain of $20000 (because you claimed it over 5 years, your costs is $20000 lower than what it should be), tax on $20000 capital gain could be from $3000 - $4500 (once again depend on personal situation and tax bracket).
The example basically demonstrated that over 5 years, you probably end up only getting $1500 by doing  it WRONG. personally, i do not believe this is alot of money for the risks involved.

(please note the above figure are estimates only)

评分

参与人数 1积分 +6 收起 理由
黑山老妖 + 6 谢谢奉献

查看全部评分

Advertisement
Advertisement

退役斑竹 2007 年度奖章获得者 2008年度奖章获得者 特殊贡献奖章 参与宝库编辑功臣

发表于 2008-8-8 17:15 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 黑山老妖 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 黑山老妖 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
我也记得stamp duty on transfer of property是要capitalise的。stamp duty on mortgage好像可以直接claim,不知道对不对。。。

退役斑竹

发表于 2008-8-8 17:23 |显示全部楼层

回复 2# 的帖子

此文章由 Artcore 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Artcore 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Stamp Duty on Transfer of Property forms part of capital cost.

Stamp Duty on Mortgage forms part of borrowing costs, can be claimed over 5 years.

Mortgage Stamp Duty on owner-occupied housing was abolished from 1 September 2007 in NSW, otherwise the rates are:
Amount secured ($) | Duty payable ($)
0 - 16,000 = $5
16,001 or more = $5 + 4 for every 1,000 (or part thereof) in excess of 16,000
做人要厚道,看贴要加分.
澳洲创业故事系列

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部