|
此文章由 Hetbert 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Hetbert 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
What the jury heard in the trial
WHAT THE CROWN SAID:
* One person murdered the Lin family at their North Epping home in Sydney, in the early hours of July 18, 2009
* Xie sedated his wife before leaving their bed and creeping into the Lin residence, 300 metres away
* Xie knew the location of the Lin's outside power box to enable the electricity to be turned off
* Xie had access to a key and knew the layout of the Lin house
* Bloodied shoe prints in the Lin home were consistent with Asics sneakers Xie wore
* On May 6, 2010, Xie cuts up shoe boxes, showing 'consciousness of guilt'
* Small 'bloodstain' - dubbed Stain 91 - on Xie's garage floor 'most likely' contains DNA of four Lin family victims
* Partly motivated by his perceived 'inferior' status in the Lin family - supported by evidence of Witness A, an inmate who recorded Xie speaking disparagingly of Min Lin
WHAT THE DEFENCE SAID:
* It wasn't one person in the dark
* Improbable all five victims could be controlled by one person; crime scene suggests more than one assailant
* Xie's wife Kathy Lin confirms his alibi of being asleep with her at the time of the murders
* Disputes DNA evidence and the Crown's assertion stain on Xie's garage floor is blood
* No evidence showing Xie motivated to harm the Lin family
* Xie got on well with Lin family and was particularly close to nephew Henry
* He cut up the shoe boxes as he feared police would falsely implicate him in the murders
* Conversations with Witness A were 'nothing more than jail talk'
* Denies Crown's suggestion of a sexual motive, details of which cannot be published.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news ... d-Sunday-Night.html
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|