新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 吉祥物大PK——好一个花胖子 (2009-6-14) edith921 · 安居乐业之找工记 (2006-5-15) sail
· 永远的Austen (2008-10-14) 雨睿 · TIGUAN 项目竣工了 2012年继续更新 V4.1地图上路.. 第8页 (2011-3-23) morningsun
Advertisement
Advertisement
楼主:schee

CPA 117 Extended Case Study [复制链接]

发表于 2011-10-22 21:04 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 wellye 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 wellye 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 adam1234hk 于 2011-10-22 21:01 发表

sorry i cannt find it. Can u tell me which page and which line? I mean which line mention "Joint Venture" two words


案例里说了partnership,partnership就是属于joint venture的,why do u still need to find joint venture?
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-22 21:49 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 adam1234hk 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 adam1234hk 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 wellye 于 2011-10-22 21:04 发表


案例里说了partnership,partnership就是属于joint venture的,why do u still need to find joint venture?

ok thank you

发表于 2011-10-22 22:37 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 gerence 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 gerence 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 wellye 于 2011-10-22 21:04 发表


案例里说了partnership,partnership就是属于joint venture的,why do u still need to find joint venture?


but can it also be seen as "strategic alliance"?

strategic alliance can also take the form of partnership

[ 本帖最后由 gerence 于 2011-10-22 23:12 编辑 ]

发表于 2011-10-22 22:46 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
怎么大家都觉得modes of entry是重点吗?

发表于 2011-10-23 00:24 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 tjjimmycy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 tjjimmycy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
不是重点,但肯定会是个考点

发表于 2011-10-23 00:42 |显示全部楼层

回复 gerence 213# 帖子

此文章由 kayroro 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kayroro 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
i think strategic alliance is a more complicated case as mentioned in4.51 bottom "joint-equity venture"
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-23 00:44 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 kayroro 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kayroro 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
about external consistncy for GM , anyone any ideas?

mine is" the industry and coffee market still offers opportunity for L to expand business by new products and gain growth through it."  not very sure about it

发表于 2011-10-23 01:26 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 kreuz777 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kreuz777 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
for module 5, comparison of new buiness development tools can be tested.....is it

发表于 2011-10-23 11:43 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 kayroro 于 2011-10-23 00:44 发表
about external consistncy for GM , anyone any ideas?

mine is" the industry and coffee market still offers opportunity for L to expand business by new products and gain growth through it."  not very  ...

yes, I agree!especially for US market, it is very mature so Lavazza needs to use new products to attract customers.

[ 本帖最后由 z3156924 于 2011-10-23 11:44 编辑 ]

发表于 2011-10-23 12:51 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Milklatte 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Milklatte 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
May I confirm you the mode of entry for acquisition of Green Mountain is JV/Alliance OR acquisition? Ref. P16 last para. it has indicate Lavazza hopes that through its partnership with GM to become the 2nd biggest players in US market. Please advice

发表于 2011-10-23 14:46 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 xaviersun 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xaviersun 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Does anyone have any idea on risk assessment? do we need to point out all of the risk categories for each strategic option?

any idea? Thanks.
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-23 15:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Milklatte 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Milklatte 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Ref study material: P.4.53 acquisition - buy another business and end up controlling it. Lavazza only purchase a small stake in Green Mountain, its means Lavazza does not controlling GM. Please correct me, if I am wrong.

发表于 2011-10-23 18:32 |显示全部楼层

回复 kayroro 217# 帖子

此文章由 yilush 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yilush 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
May I know what the stratgy of Lavazza?based on that we then could analysis the strategy options. For internal conssitency, L is focus on high quality product and service, but its aggressive expansion plan means it targets to large it market share, conflict? cause we know high quality implies a relative small market share. I'm struggling for the evaluating the strategic options.
External consistency - Yes or no
internal consistency - Yes or no
feasibility?

发表于 2011-10-23 18:56 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 Milklatte 于 2011-10-23 15:40 发表
Ref study material: P.4.53 acquisition - buy another business and end up controlling it. Lavazza only purchase a small stake in Green Mountain, its means Lavazza does not controlling GM. Please correc ...

yes, I think it's part acquisition, but it can be seen as JV as well, because from the case facts, we may infer L joins GM to minimize the potential risks of expansion in US market.

发表于 2011-10-23 18:57 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yilush 于 2011-10-23 18:32 发表
May I know what the stratgy of Lavazza?based on that we then could analysis the strategy options. For internal conssitency, L is focus on high quality product and service, but its aggressive expansion ...


high quality doesnt necessarily mean small market share. small market is focus..

发表于 2011-10-23 19:17 |显示全部楼层

回复 z3156924 225# 帖子

此文章由 yilush 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yilush 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
so it means for external consistence, the answer is 'Yes'? How about for the next 3 issues? Tks!
How to evaluate it's internal consistence?
I know feasibility and competitive advantage would be 'yes'
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-23 20:13 |显示全部楼层

回复 yilush 223# 帖子

此文章由 kayroro 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kayroro 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
my opinion for indian plant+GM
External consistency Y
internal consistency  Y
feasibility                      N

any suggestions?

发表于 2011-10-23 21:28 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 iluvpenny 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 iluvpenny 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
any point for market penetration? as most of them are market and pd development

发表于 2011-10-23 21:41 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 kreuz777 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kreuz777 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
feasibility        N     why not, L has many previous successful jv experience, and expertise in espresso coffee, just cost a lot to build the plant. but it can minimise the shipping costs........

发表于 2011-10-23 22:20 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 nirvanaaa 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nirvanaaa 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Some confusion:
Acquisition of two Indian companies: the Barista Coffee Company Limited and Fresh & Honest Café Limited in 2007, is it market development or vertical integration?
India is a new market for Lavazza, but purchasing cafe chain is indeed vertical integration.

发表于 2011-10-23 22:36 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yilush 于 2011-10-23 19:17 发表
so it means for external consistence, the answer is 'Yes'? How about for the next 3 issues? Tks!
How to evaluate it's internal consistence?
I know feasibility and competitive advantage would be 'yes' ...


Hi, in my opinion, External is quite consistent. you can argue both ways in terms of internal consistency.
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-23 22:39 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 z3156924 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 z3156924 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 kreuz777 于 2011-10-23 21:41 发表
feasibility        N     why not, L has many previous successful jv experience, and expertise in espresso coffee, just cost a lot to build the plant. but it can minimise the shipping costs........

i dont think it is feasible, you can argue it requires large amount of investment, it might cause problem.
but of course, you can say it is feasible as long as you have evidence to support your idea, examiner will give you points.
that's just my thought.

发表于 2011-10-23 23:49 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 maidywang 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 maidywang 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
关于case中提到的Lavazza的4个在意大利的工厂,有什么application 吗?

发表于 2011-10-24 00:22 |显示全部楼层

case3

此文章由 005400 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 005400 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
大家在case3里大家有没有分short term 和 long term 啊
                  india  = Md      +       VI
                    us   = Pd      +       pd
有其他意见吗,谢

发表于 2011-10-24 01:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 nokjo86 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nokjo86 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Just wanna check if value disciplice is one of the contributions to  differentiation for L as being innovative product leadership

发表于 2011-10-24 01:46 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 nokjo86 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nokjo86 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Also if the generic strategy is "best cost or value for money"? Cause i believe leader strategy is still about the lowest cost but not for best cost strategy. Is this the case for L?
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-24 03:19 |显示全部楼层

回复 pinky1030 110# 帖子

此文章由 nokjo86 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nokjo86 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
How would you analysis the factors or non-factors of strategic capabilities as there is no competitor mentioned?

发表于 2011-10-24 03:53 |显示全部楼层

回复 chun4u 177# 帖子

此文章由 Milklatte 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Milklatte 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Will you apply all the question list in P5.18,20,21,23 table. Or just give a summary conclusion for each criteria?

发表于 2011-10-24 05:38 |显示全部楼层

回复 iluvpenny 228# 帖子

此文章由 nokjo86 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 nokjo86 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Campaign and marketing - advertisement is regard as market penetration - to attract customer and increase sale

发表于 2011-10-24 12:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 iluvpenny 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 iluvpenny 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 kayroro 于 2011-10-23 20:13 发表
my opinion for indian plant+GM
External consistency Y
internal consistency  Y
feasibility                      N

any suggestions?


India plant should it be diversification? but india seems not new market

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部