新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 前杠喷漆+漆面保护=真的不能不求人了【图多手机慎点】 (2017-6-12) Simonjo · 给我家公子做个狗屋 (2007-1-3) homeway
· I can't see myself... (2007-1-17) Kingfisher · The story of a young immigrant (so far) (2006-12-26) 黑山老妖
Advertisement
Advertisement
楼主:嘉jacinta

[其他] 公司知道我怀孕后,今天找我谈话 [复制链接]

发表于 2014-8-19 14:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 zippo0307 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 zippo0307 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
lulucai 发表于 2014-8-19 14:15
保留职位还发薪水???

这是说国内么?澳洲哪家公司还发薪水啊, 估计也就银行这种给工资,普通公司都不给 ...

很多大公司都有内部福利,更何况政府也要发PPL
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2014-8-19 14:29 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 rayki 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 rayki 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 rayki 于 2014-8-19 14:30 编辑
han020573 发表于 2014-8-19 14:07
多探讨一下,没有关系。
这确实是非常重要的信息,关系每个人。
等我回家,仔细研究一下 ...


恩。理解。  我也觉得如果有法律人士很统一一下意见就更好了。。 反正我以前曾经咨询过fairwork。 对方明确说录音不能作为证据。
我的理解在特定的情况下。应该是可以。但是具体怎么操作就没数了。

whirlpool也有讨论的。
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1904409

后面还有一个

http://www.employmentlawonline.com.au/question3-2/

Typical Question

I recorded my termination meeting because I was fearful that the employer would say that I resigned and was not sacked if I later brought an unfair dismissal claim. Can I use the recording in court?
Short Answer

The Surveillance Devices Act 1999 and other legal precedence sets limitations on what recordings can be used to support your case. This is largely because individuals would not make incriminating statements if they were aware they were being recorded. However, everyone’s case is different and there are some circumstances where recordings can be used to support your case.

Read the long answer below or if you need professional legal advice  fill out the form at the bottom of the page and our representatives will contact you back.
Long Answer

You may have been fearful that your employer would manipulate the outcome of your meetings to better their case should you bring legal action against them to enforce your employment rights. You may have recorded the conversation to protect yourself in the future against any adverse action from your employer. If you have been worried for some time about your employer’s unlawful conduct, you may even have established a dossier of recordings which you intend to use to establish your employer’s wrongdoing and assist any future claim which you may make.

However there is legislation in place which limits your ability to use those recordings in legal proceedings. You may have complied with the law when you covertly recorded the conversations, however this may be of limited use in defending your employment rights if you cannot use it in a court or tribunal against your employer.
Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic)

The purpose of the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) is to restrict the use, communication and publication of information that is obtained through the use of surveillance devices. Such devices can include audio, visual and tracking devices. Permission may be granted under the Act to covertly record conversations between individuals, however these are usually granted to Police for the investigation of criminal offences.

Protected information is defined in section 30D as information obtained from the use of surveillance devices. If you seek to bring your recording to the attention of a court or tribunal in which you have brought your matter, you are using and publishing the protected information. It is the use of the information for tendering the evidence in the court or tribunal which attracts prohibitions and limitations. The protection exists for employers and employees to prevent any injustice which may arise from recordings. As it is unlikely that any individual would make incriminating statements if they knew it would be used against them at a later date, this protection must be enforced when those statements are used against that person’s interests.

You are not permitted to install surveillance devices if you intend to record your fellow colleagues or employers’ private conversations. However you are permitted to record conversations to which you are a party. It is how you use that information which is subject to prohibitions and limitations.

The Act prohibits the communication or publication of private conversations or activities. Section 11 prohibits you knowingly communicating or publishing the recording of your private conversations with your employer which you have obtained through the use of a surveillance device. There are exceptions to this prohibition which include -

- A communication made with the express or implied consent of each party to the private conversation

- A communication that is no more than is reasonably necessary
- In the public interest; or
- For the protection of the lawful interests of the person making it; or

- A communication in the course of legal or disciplinary proceedings.

If you asked your employer for consent to record any meetings held between you and it was given, it is unlikely that your employer would have made any incriminating statements. It is crucial that if you have recorded any private discussions that you are very cautious about who you allow to listen to the recordings as it is the disclosure of the recorded information which is prohibited. You may disclose this recorded information to your lawyer as it is for the protection of your lawful interests, and your lawyer may use this information to assist in your employment matter.

This Act should not be taken lightly as you may be found to have committed an offence if you publish the information which you have secretly obtained. If you intentionally or recklessly publish or use the protected information which you have obtained through your recordings, you may be found guilty of an offence and be liable for imprisonment of up to 2 years under section 30E.Your employer may consider proceedings against you if your recording involves the misuse of its confidential business information, hence any use of your recorded information may come with serious consequences.

In addition to regulating the use of recordings between you and your employer, the Act provides specific protection for your workplace privacy under Part 2A. Section 9B prohibits your employer from knowingly installing or using optical and listening surveillance devices to observe, listen, record or monitor your activities or conversations in bathrooms and private areas. Section 9C prohibits you from communicating or publishing an activity or conversation recorded under section 9B. Your employer cannot record you in private areas such as bathrooms or change rooms; however this does not prohibit your employer from monitoring you in more public areas such as your shop floor or working area.

If you record conversations to which you are a party, you must be cautious not to publish or disclose it to anyone who is not your lawyer. You are prohibited from using it for any reason, except for the protection of your own lawful interests or in a legal matter. However there are additional requirements under the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) which may need to be complied with for tendering evidence, depending on which court or tribunal you seek to use the recording in. You should bring any recorded information to your lawyer’s attention, but its use as evidence in courts and tribunals should be a decision made carefully and with ample consideration as to the consequences.
我来问道无余话,云在青天水在瓶

发表于 2014-8-19 14:42 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 NicoleLiu 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 NicoleLiu 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
不是说怀孕后24个月都不能解雇吗?
而且PPL不是政府给的吗?公司可以向政府要回来的,公司干嘛这么多事。

发表于 2014-8-19 14:45 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 tigerandgolf 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 tigerandgolf 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
vanvan 发表于 2014-8-19 14:21
没有试用期。这点都挺好的

那问题不大,除非真想开除你,就要用performance来给你warning什么的。

发表于 2014-8-19 14:54 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Carmen_lee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Carmen_lee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
15人一下的小公司可以任意解雇职员的

前段时间写Paper找资料时看到的,fairwork的一个Pdf有写,法律里也有写

发表于 2014-8-20 09:38 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 cnj8848 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 cnj8848 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
楼主保重,钱是小事,健康为重
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2014-8-20 17:01 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 依栏听荷 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 依栏听荷 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
未经许可好像不能够录音,更不能作为证据。会有官司的。我们公司之前就出了这个问题

发表于 2014-8-21 12:20 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 carrie0311 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 carrie0311 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
怎么会这样

发表于 2014-8-21 14:18 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 axin 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 axin 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
楼主想想离开这家公司后可以怎样安排生活工作吧。

预好。
头像被屏蔽

禁止发言

发表于 2014-8-21 14:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 melbrose 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 melbrose 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
其实真的 只要找个理由 不说怀孕  一样辞退的  楼主切莫纠结这个哟,打官司不值得。 Redundancy 现在的经济环境下很普遍的,即便fair trade 我认为做不了什么有效果调节的。 你不如多要些补偿 比如 可以离开,不给你们找麻烦,支付我1个月工资和SUPER,但是我不工作。 这个我觉得你公司会考虑的,他们也不想麻烦哟。你可以先说我要2个月无条件工资提前支付,然后再砍到1个月或者1个半月。我们公司好几个都这样达成了意愿,管理层也满意。

发表于 2014-8-21 22:22 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 zzgirl 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 zzgirl 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
我倒觉得LZ的身体可能因为怀孕确实不能胜任工作。怀孕期间会有很多困难,大公司能体谅,小公司可能就很难两全了。LZ身体显然不是很好,或者胎不是很稳,可以考虑保胎再说。毕竟如果你老是硬撑对孩子,对公司都不好。
寻找一杯温开水,喝下去有助于养胃.不刺激,平平淡淡,却能温暖全身。
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2014-8-21 22:28 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 roo81 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 roo81 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
职场险恶啊。
我前2天还看到公司楼上在举办如何解雇受伤员工的讲座。资本家黑的很。

发表于 2014-8-22 13:24 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 healthyz 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 healthyz 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
baby is much more important than anything

发表于 2014-8-22 17:14 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 zdmdyf 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 zdmdyf 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
主动辞职,还能有个好的推荐信,在家养身体吧,孩子是关键

发表于 2014-8-22 19:09 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 lga 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 lga 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
主动辞职

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部