CPA 113 考前讨论帖。。。【考试结束咯！】

106

原帖由 Errand 于 2-5-2010 11:01 发表
ABL currently is not in the bottled water manufacturing industry, there are already many well know bottled brands, for example, Butlers has still water brand ‘Olympus’, Sparkling water ‘Eau de Vivr ...

great point:)

deepsea

how have you been doing with the 7s. I found I have to copy a lot from the chiecken case? Any new issues? thanks .

GreenTea2010

I just started doing this. checking Multiple choice questions in Chicken case.

What could be the key strategic issue for ABL? any suggesstions? thanks

deepsea

原帖由 GreenTea2010 于 2010-5-2 14:43 发表
I just started doing this. checking Multiple choice questions in Chicken case.

What could be the key strategic issue for ABL? any suggesstions? thanks

which part a or b?

GreenTea2010

Part A. Task2

GAP analysis. I don't know what could be the main gaps(strategic issues) for ABL.

GreenTea2010

原帖由 deepsea 于 2010-5-2 14:31 发表
how have you been doing with the 7s. I found I have to copy a lot from the chiecken case? Any new issues? thanks .

Do you mean the 7 S analysis over acquisition of snack food busi?

deepsea

原帖由 GreenTea2010 于 2010-5-2 14:48 发表
Part A. Task2

GAP analysis. I don't know what could be the main gaps(strategic issues) for ABL.

gap between no. 1 & no. 2
high csd%
skill/experience shortage

have u completed part 2?

i mean the 7s for hydrate acquisition

GreenTea2010

not completed. sorry

deepsea

anybody knows any new issues for the hydrate acquisition? i can't find any new issues apart from the ones listed in the chicken case? pleeeeeeeeeeeeease help

sunshinelily

原帖由 GreenTea2010 于 2010-5-2 13:03 发表
1)In what life cycle NAB?    BW?            my answer: NAB mature,    BW growth

2)NAB history, future growth, profitability?   NAB growth: history medium, future medium to low;  NAB profitability:  ...

1.BW growth: history--->high, future--->medium to high

2. BW profitability: history--->high, future--->medium to high

不知道其他同学是怎样的意见呢？

longyu68

原帖由 Errand 于 2010-5-2 13:01 发表
ABL currently is not in the bottled water manufacturing industry, there are already many well know bottled brands, for example, Butlers has still water brand ‘Olympus’, Sparkling water ‘Eau de Vivr ...

如果， ABL收购Hydrate，ABL就会获得了BRAND，也不需要去CATCH UP很多。因此，这些不是证明ABL没有MARKET ORIENTATION 能力的证明。

反过来，ABL's product development is at the forefront of the gloable trends(p18, paragraph 2). Further, in response to key consumption patterns that the company continuously monitors, ABL is exploring a new product idea. Therefore, this is ABL’s true strategic capability.

johnjohn

Strategic capabilities, competitive advantage and Strategic advantage are they all the same but in different terms?  plz help!!

Errand

原帖由 longyu68 于 2010-5-2 16:59 发表


如果， ABL收购Hydrate，ABL就会获得了BRAND，也不需要去CATCH UP很多。因此，这些不是证明ABL没有MARKET ORIENTATION 能力的证明。

反过来，ABL's product development is at the forefront of the gloable  ...

你也说了，是如果。。。how abt 如果没有如果？(paopaobing(41))

sogoe

原帖由 sunshinelily 于 2010-5-2 16:47 发表

1.BW growth: history--->high, future--->medium to high

2. BW profitability: history--->high, future--->medium to high

不知道其他同学是怎样的意见呢？

同意！

sogoe

原帖由 Errand 于 2010-5-2 20:58 发表


你也说了，是如果。。。how abt 如果没有如果？(paopaobing(41))

其实这个分析是关于哪方面？

JETCHEN2008

establishing a sense of urgency  有人写了嘛？请高手帮帮忙！

longyu68

原帖由 Errand 于 2010-5-2 20:58 发表

你也说了，是如果。。。how abt 如果没有如果？(paopaobing(41))

无论他是否进入BOTTLED WATER， 他的市场能力都在。这里讲的是对市场选择和市场研究的能力，不是他目前的市场地位。04年他选择了不进，是因为这个市场小，不是他能力不够。因为他没有在04年进，导致他目前在BOTTLE WATER的市场地位不理想，也不是他没有能力的证明。

[ 本帖最后由 longyu68 于 2010-5-2 21:20 编辑 ]

SEIKO

如果ACQURE HYDRATE，到底是FINE TUNING 还是 INCREMENTAL

我之前写的FINE TUNING ，现在有点感觉是INCREMENTAL

有人讨论下么？

sogoe

原帖由 JETCHEN2008 于 2010-5-2 21:09 发表
establishing a sense of urgency  有人写了嘛？请高手帮帮忙！

不是高手，写出来看看有没有帮助，抛砖抛砖。
The sale of Hydrate Water can be explained by Jack Wells retirement plan and he is not willing to sell the business to an international company. For ABL perspective, there’s an urgent need for this acquisition as they want to enter the bottled water market to keep the company future growth and meet their strategic goal.

sogoe

原帖由 SEIKO 于 2010-5-2 21:16 发表
如果ACQURE HYDRATE，到底是FINE TUNING 还是 INCREMENTAL

我之前写的FINE TUNING ，现在有点感觉是INCREMENTAL

有人讨论下么？

应该是incremental吧，根据定义，fine tuning是对现行政策的调整，incremental是新增对策吧。

Gina

原帖由 sogoe 于 2010-5-2 21:25 发表


应该是incremental吧，根据定义，fine tuning是对现行政策的调整，incremental是新增对策吧。

我觉得是 INCREMENTAL.

今天总算把 PART B 写完了。 内容真多呀。 是不是只会有一道题目， 关于 ACQUISATION 的？ 我懒得写 收购 FOUNTAIN 了， 我押 收购 HYDRATE.

JETCHEN2008

太感谢了

rogerze5046

原帖由 Gina 于 2010-5-2 21:32 发表


我觉得是 INCREMENTAL.

今天总算把 PART B 写完了。 内容真多呀。 是不是只会有一道题目， 关于 ACQUISATION 的？ 我懒得写 收购 FOUNTAIN 了， 我押 收购 HYDRATE.

  这位妈妈是我们的偶像。。。。

JETCHEN2008

我写了一点KOTTER'S steps 如果你愿意的的话我们可以交换一下，你觉得呢？
我的邮箱 jet_chen2008@yahoo.com.au

sogoe

原帖由 JETCHEN2008 于 2010-5-2 21:34 发表
太感谢了

不谢不谢，共勉.

SEIKO

原帖由 sogoe 于 2010-5-2 21:25 发表


应该是incremental吧，根据定义，fine tuning是对现行政策的调整，incremental是新增对策吧。

嗯，我被说服了

Gina

原帖由 rogerze5046 于 2010-5-2 21:36 发表



  这位妈妈是我们的偶像。。。。

为啥? 是因为我写完了 PART B？  还是因为我押 收购 HYDRATE ?

我老公帮我写了2道题。

rogerze5046

....................

rogerze5046

原帖由 Gina 于 2010-5-2 21:51 发表


为啥? 是因为我写完了 PART B？  还是因为我押 收购 HYDRATE ?

我老公帮我写了2道题。

要带孩子还可以写那么多挺不错了。。
我今天带狗去看病。。折腾了大半个下午。。

SEIKO

phase 2 - after acquisition of Hydrate, an alternative vision needs to be provided by ABL?