|
此文章由 humphreysang 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 humphreysang 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 humphreysang 于 2013-6-17 19:03 编辑
iuij 发表于 2013-6-17 12:36 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d46/d4d469e5ff88ee3d52ac5f4e4e5d1780c6756876" alt=""
感谢LZ分享 不过个人感觉这称不上一个一劳永逸的方法
更准确地说是以防万一的方法 因为我想在这边买房子 ...
That is so right, ATO is getting nastier. There is a tendency that ATO could claim the private ruling is not binding on the basis that the documents submitted are not exactly the true reflection of what happened. But generally, for simple scenarios as the overseas transfer, it is still worth trying to lodge a private ruling (it costs you nothing, and you can get some experience of how to communicate with ATO).
For the information sharing (or the formal term "EOI exchange of information"), it is a provision in Double tax treaties b/n countries. It is increasingly likely that China and Australia will have data-matching program in the future.
Currently as far as I know, there are not many exchanges of such kind b/n China and Australia, if any, the reasons may be as follows:
1. It is a big pain for ATO to match a English Surname with a Chinese character. They better pass Chinese IELTS test first.
2. Chinese government just felt the pain of GFC in this year. Previously, they were not under revenue-raising pressure to tax overseas Chinese.
3. There may be other concerns for Chinese government to engage in such kind of information exchange (communist party, you all understand).
But for other English-Speaking countries, it will be a big risk for you to hide your assets across Canada, UK, NZ, US and Australia. Every country has a big deficit and want to tax whatever they can. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|