|
回复 51# 的帖子
此文章由 gozh2005 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 gozh2005 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
I like this discussion.
1. I didn't invent the new terminology, it is microsoft. Even the concept is similar, but don't you need to learn how to use it right and well. Some are not hard and can be picked up quickly but there are some you need to spend time to really try and learn,
Generally speaking, you can say there is no difference in any program or operating systems, they are all based on Van-neumann, with reigesters and memory operation.
2. >>底层技术是不是基于oo的
Most of current main stream language is multi-paradigm.
OO is not the whole world, it was dominant but this is chaning. Both Java and .net now are introducing more and more features from functional languages. Undersanding of OO means you maybe a good programmer, but doesn't mean you are a smart programmer
So please have a look the difference of OO and functional first, the come back to say things like this.
3. >>他所有的新技术,就是让程序员的门槛变低
I agree with it, which is the reason there are so many BAD microsoft programmers.
4. 什么大项目大系统都是Java做的
I talked about it before. As I said, .net as a language is good. But in australian, the biggest IT service company is IBM, HP/EDS second. what will they use, especially IBM, of course the Java stuff.
5.我想现在大部分人做的系统就是非常简单的应用软件.
That is the small project exactly .net can do and always does, without even a need of architecturer, how much the developer can be paid.
6. If you are happy what you are and don't want to learn anything, maybe you still can be fine and living a good life, that is your choice. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|