|
此文章由 chatchat 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 chatchat 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
1)limited consultation: 楼上写得很好 可以着重: the most important stakeholders of the policy: the () of families who registered and took the Selective exam in 2022 were kept in the dark.
2)the nature of the policy does not improve the status quo but goes backwards in the following areas:
a) by not giving straight and exact exam marks to families of candidates, it goes backwards in transparency, without which fairness is not achievable.
b) by setting a percentage of admittance of certain groups of students, it goes against
The High Potential and Gifted Education Policy which "promotes engagement and challenge for every student, regardless of background, in every school across intellectual, creative, social-emotional and physical domains."
下面这条也可说
c) It is going backwards in achieving excellence for students learning English as a second language. Currently, a large number of students in selective school come from non-English speaking background. The HSC results of the selective schools in the past decades proved that past Policy recognised and catered for those students' potential and talent. These students will be unfairly disadvantaged by the new policy.
d) Selective test is very competitive, 10% difference in performance affects not only those admitted into the program because of the lowered bar but also those unfairly barred out, the former might struggle to cope with peers in Selective school while the later might not get enough support for their talent in a comprehensive school. The new policy is crude and irresponsible to both groups of students. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|