|
此文章由 caisang 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 caisang 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 caisang 于 2020-6-4 12:01 编辑
唐三马 发表于 2020-6-4 10:20 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d46/d4d469e5ff88ee3d52ac5f4e4e5d1780c6756876" alt=""
把别人的孩子的照片放上社交媒体?作为摄影爱好者,需要先调查并尊重西方社会的相关法律和习俗哦。
...
谢谢评论。在公共场所拍摄的纪实摄影(包括拍摄对象是孩子)以及并不用作商业用途的拍摄行为,不违法,具体的法律解读链接见下文。纪实摄影确实有些争议,如果按照对隐私权的过度解读,那很多流传于世撼动人心的新闻摄影作品就不复存在,流传下来的只能是风光和花草了。人,才是最美最值得拍摄的风景。
https://www.artslaw.com.au/info- ... otographers-rights/
It is generally possible to take photographs in a public place without asking permission. This extends to taking photographs of buildings, sites and people. In a case involving street surveillance photography used as evidence in a criminal case, an Australian judge stated “a person, in our society, does not have a right not to be photographed.”[1] There are, however, some limitations to this statement, which are discussed in this information sheet.
Some photographers have been approached by the police while on the street taking photographs. The police are usually responding to a complaint by some member of the public who is concerned about children being photographed and who have a mistaken belief that the consent of the parents or guardian must be obtained before children can be photographed. Street photographers should be prepared to respond to this situation, either by acknowledging the concerns of the parents and adopting appropriate strategies, such as explaining what you are doing and asking it is OK to take photographs; or otherwise have the information on street photographer’s rights so that you can have a conversation in which you explain what you are doing and why you have a right to engage in street photography.
出于对读者的尊重,我把那张照片换了,以避免无谓争端,但这并不代表我认同你的观点。
再次谢谢关注。 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|