|
此文章由 stevenhu 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 stevenhu 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
xixixierbiliu 发表于 2016-7-15 12:59 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d46/d4d469e5ff88ee3d52ac5f4e4e5d1780c6756876" alt=""
中菲南中国海仲裁案的仲裁庭是根据《公约》附件七特别设立的。由于仲裁庭大部分成员由时任国际海洋法法庭 ...
The PCA is not a court in the traditional sense, but a permanent framework for arbitral tribunals constituted to resolve specific disputes.
PCA在自己网站都说自己不是court了,咱还能把他升级吗
https://pca-cpa.org/en/about/
熟悉澳洲法律体系的都知道, tribunal不是法庭
The explanation for this is in the Australian Constitution. The first three chapters of the Australian Constitution are headed "The Parliament" (the legislature), "The Executive Government" (the administration) and "The Judicature" (the judiciary). In the early years of Federation, the High Court of Australia held that the Constitution required a separation of these three functions. Accordingly, the executive or administration cannot exercise judicial power. Judicial power can only be exercised by courts. The High Court also defined what courts are. Courts are required to be comprised of independent judicial officers with security of tenure and to have the power to make and enforce orders. Accordingly, tribunals are not courts.
PCA哪凉快去哪玩去吧,大国都签了排他条款,领土不受调节
|
|