一年前发过一次AI垃圾的帖子。一年后的现在再次问ai，，，更垃圾

呼呼呼

当年问过一个 total 8 people attend same 4 swimming competitions,  each position has the following points:  first has 20 points, second has 15 points, third has 12 points, forth has 9 points, fifth has 6 points, sixth has 4 points, seventh has 3 points, eighth has 2 points.  Each of people may achieve an award if has total 40 points. What is the maximum number of people who can achieve an award?

当年AI给的结果是 4   8  等等等（过去没有7或6）。

现在同样问题，同样文字，答案变成了7。并且有了一些看着很专业的过程。只是，，，还是错的。

不同的是： 加一句 the answer should be 6之后，，， AI同样输出类似的看着很专业的过程（与第一次答复基本一致）；区别仅仅是在最后结论刻意加了一句7不可能（没说细节原因），只有6可能，所以答案是6，，，

所谓聪明的位置： 再次询问同样问题之后，直接给出答案6。

遗憾的是，关闭窗口，重新开一个，录入同样问题。答案又回到7了。

真狗！

当年有人跟帖嘲笑英文之类（即说录入的问题文字不对之类）。估计肯定不是“家长”。看原题英文字样估计能气死你。希望这次就别纠结英文啦。

wdq2347

只能说家长不了解AI机制，不会用而已。你不解释清楚，这AI就很懒，节省token和算力不给你全部测试。
最后的问题要加上Thoroughly test how many people can receive an award at most?
Grok3给出的答案是
Step 6: Conclusion
n=6 is achievable (e.g., 42, 42, 45, 50, 42, 43), with 2 others taking 11 and 9.
n=7 fails because 280 points leave only 4, insufficient for the 8th person’s minimum of 8.
Maximum high scores (4 × 20 + 4 × 15 + 4 × 12 = 188) limit n when pushing beyond 6.
Final Answer: At most 6 people can receive an award.

呼呼呼

wdq2347 发表于 2025-3-13 09:52
只能说家长不了解AI机制，不会用而已。你不解释清楚，这AI就很懒，节省token和算力不给你全部测试。
最后的 ...

不是。重复：与英文或问题形式无关。用您的语言在chatgpt 还是一样结果。7

并且按原始语言grok 上答案是7

按您的提问，grok上答案是 5  

total 8 people attend same 4 swimming competitions,  each position has the following points:  first has 20 points, second has 15 points, third has 12 points, forth has 9 points, fifth has 6 points, sixth has 4 points, seventh has 3 points, eighth has 2 points.  Each of people may achieve an award if has total 40 points. Thoroughly test how many people can receive an award at most?

呼呼呼

更为有趣的是在grok里同样问题，关闭窗口，新开，录入同样文字。。 一直在输出过程中，跟卡死了一样。不断输出同样内容的计算过程。无法结束。。。