新足迹 › 论坛 › 兴趣爱好区 › IT与科技 › IT专业论坛 › 另外一道tricky的AWS题目, 求大神点拨

精华好帖回顾
· 参加活动-三个定焦小狗头 (2011-7-14) kur7	· The Great Ocean Road-大洋路二日游全攻略（34楼照片更新） (2006-1-7) eshao
· 那年那月那个世界---环球攻略大坑慢慢填。更新29/06 (2009-6-20) leski	· 有线加无线-新装监控系统的组合 (2016-7-21) daniello

查看: 2427|回复: 4

另外一道tricky的AWS题目, 求大神点拨 [复制链接]

指点江山

头像被屏蔽

禁止发言

发表于 2019-6-7 13:52 |显示全部楼层

此文章由指点江山原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者指点江山所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

A Solutions Architect has a multi-layer application running in Amazon VPC. The application has an ELB Classic Load Balancer as the front end in a public subnet, and an Amazon EC2-based reverse proxy that performs content-based routing to two backend Amazon EC2 instances hosted in a private subnet. The Architect sees tremendous traffic growth and is concerned that the reverse proxy and current backend setup will be insufficient.

Which actions should the Architect take to achieve a cost-effective solution that ensures the application automatically scales to meet traffic demand? (Select TWO)

A. Replace the Amazon EC2 reverse proxy with an EL8 internal Classic Load Balancer
B. Add Auto Scaling to the Amazon EC2 backend fleet
C. Add Auto Scaling to the Amazon EC2 reverse proxy layer
D. Use t2 burstable instance types for the backend fleet
E. Replace both the frontend and reverse proxy layers with an ELB Application Load Balancer

很多人说 B , C
另外一些人说A, B
还有人说B, E

真是众说纷纭啊, 我自己觉得B, C是对的, 求大神点拨