有关澳洲参加AIIB的评论， 谁能翻译一下

tennisBoy

Disagree. A seat at the table invites us to fight iniquity from the inside. The alternative is to gather on the stoop and protest all too feebly what is being done to us rather than by us. And being in the company of would be Asian influence is no more or less compromising than supping with the IMF. Each are potential forces for good or hegemony, but straddling both if we can manage it tends to greater choice in a way that can only be as good as our sincere intentions to participate in either at a level reflecting out interest in beneficial development as opposed to free for all exploitation.

Venator

这段文字组织得很差，没必要强逐字翻译

cjpking

老实说我看不懂，问了印度同事也没有看懂

sushier

不用翻译，这段话的作者是初小水平

cangaru

大概意思就是：
＂我们＂应该参与其中（大概指AIIB）比我们作为外人更有发言权，参与亚洲影响力的集团并不消弱与IMF的合作。同时参与两者会使我们的利益和兴趣得到更好的体现，而不要人为刀俎我为鱼肉

tennisBoy

给一下原文的出处:
ABC News>  Analysis & Opinion >Why should we join another development bank? >

Comment By Hudson Godfrey