求助：maternity leave 被裁，给不给in lieu of notice

shuang219

公司由于financial 的问题，被receivership，准备关门大吉。

我被redudant，但是我还在maternity leave

公司给了4周的notice period，让我自己work out

我觉得这样似乎不公平，我本来就在休假，无法work notice period。觉得应该拿 inlieu of notice。

不知道理解的对不对。

网上有没有相关的条例，可以和HR讨论时 作为依据。

btw我在NSW

ccccc5

那个时候规定不能裁的啊！上次我老板还跟我说过的，孕期，生产期不能被裁的！

shuang219

ccccc5 发表于 2014-7-15 21:06
那个时候规定不能裁的啊！上次我老板还跟我说过的，孕期，生产期不能被裁的！ ...

公司要关门了，也属于特殊情况。

ccccc5

找到啦！
http://www.fairwork.gov.au/leave ... ployee-entitlements

ccccc5

你去这里问问，他们是仲裁机构，可以接受你的申诉！

ccccc5

shuang219 发表于 2014-7-15 21:09
公司要关门了，也属于特殊情况。

哦，整个公司都有关了啊！那就不好说了！

FOR

公司是破产了，所以只能按规定给赔偿吧。产假期间也不会比正常上班的赔偿多的吧。

夏雪

安慰一下

vinsonz

破产

shuang219

一般被redudancy 有两个方式。

1. 当场开掉，拿inlieu of notice
2. 给notice period，继续上班工作 拿工资。

然而我因为还是产假，无法上班，也同样拿不到工资。我觉得，应该直接被开掉，拿in lieu of notice.

bluesknight

ccccc5 发表于 2014-7-15 21:14
哦，整个公司都有关了啊！那就不好说了！

就算不是公司关门也可以炒的，只是不能以怀孕为理由炒人。

An employee can’t be discriminated against because she’s pregnant. This means that an employee can’t be fired, demoted or treated differently to other employees because she’s pregnant.

LZ这个情况应该要求公司给in lieu of notice，除非公司会开门直到你产假结束

righttang

in lieu of notice + severance这个应该是给的
前面那个一般是4周，后面那个是根据你工作时限来的

shuang219

righttang 发表于 2014-7-15 21:46
in lieu of notice + severance这个应该是给的
前面那个一般是4周，后面那个是根据你工作时限来的 ...

请问 severance 是什么？

是redundancy pay 吗？

飞儿

是我就不管了，赶紧的准备下份工哦

righttang

shuang219 发表于 2014-7-15 21:53
请问 severance 是什么？

是redundancy pay 吗？

差不多吧，就是工作几年给你多少周薪水的表格。。

Notice是另外算的

The options in the list come from the most common awards.

An employer has to pay out at least the following minimum redundancy pay. If your award has more generous entitlements, then the higher entitlement will apply.

Period of continuous service        Redundancy pay
At least 1 year but less than 2 years        4 weeks
At least 2 years but less than 3 years        6 weeks
At least 3 years but less than 4 years        7 weeks
At least 4 years but less than 5 years        8 weeks
At least 5 years but less than 6 years        10 weeks
At least 6 years but less than 7 years        11 weeks
At least 7 years but less than 8 years        13 weeks
At least 8 years but less than 9 years        14 weeks
At least 9 years but less than 10 years        16 weeks
At least 10 years        12 weeks

shuang219

飞儿 发表于 2014-7-15 21:57
是我就不管了，赶紧的准备下份工哦

整个package 牵扯到6个月的钱。。。

实在没有您这么洒脱。

shuang219

righttang 发表于 2014-7-15 22:02
差不多吧，就是工作几年给你多少周薪水的表格。。

Notice是另外算的

那我现在如何和HR 说呀。

现在只给notice period，也不用上班，

不给in lieu of notice。。。

飞儿

shuang219 发表于 2014-7-15 22:10
整个package 牵扯到6个月的钱。。。

实在没有您这么洒脱。

这样哦，肯定不少钱，那值得争

问题是成本几何哦？

Xueling77

My company went to liquidation when I was on maternity leave. I got 4 weeks notice period paid. But it's covered by GEERS. They refused to pay me 4 weeks (for my 3rd year service) as the day the company was taken over by liquidators are before my 3 years mark. I wrote many letters as i passed 3 years on the day company shut down. I got paid as over 3 years. It was grey area In my case I think but I kept trying. Didn't go to lawyer as it won't worth the effort. I got te last 4 weeks 10 months after the initial pay out. Worth all my letters and argument  

shuang219

Xueling77 发表于 2014-7-15 22:20
My company went to liquidation when I was on maternity leave. I got 4 weeks notice period paid. But  ...

多谢，想问一下

您最后拿到钱，是从政府拿的吗？

maternity leave 一般unpaid，一般不计入entitlement 时间的，
在产假期间被开掉，是不能算产假本身时间的呀。
service 时间算到休产假前 才对。。。

而且三年和二年的service，最终差别也就1周的钱。。。

hairbei

看过几个帖子后感觉在au真不敢歇产假啊。

Xueling77

shuang219 发表于 2014-7-15 22:34
多谢，想问一下

您最后拿到钱，是从政府拿的吗？

yes, we got the pay out from GEERS the government sector, I think the sale of any assets of the company then goes to the government.

It's 3 or 4 weeks difference (can't remember now, but it's more than 1 week) in our company between 2 years and 3 years.

I was 2 years plus when the liquidators took over, passed 3 years about 6 weeks before maternity leave.

bai.m

就在前段时间看了个case，就是说孕期被裁， 法院的判决。LZ可以参考看看

Two employees who were made redundant while on maternity leave have failed in their discrimination claims against their former employer, with a judge rejecting allegations they were “targeted” for dismissal after announcing their pregnancies.

http://www.vecci.org.au/policy-a ... FQ7XGMat1zrgMWBA%3D