三星开始反击了

月亮粑粑

三星电子在澳大利亚起诉苹果侵犯专利。三星电子在邮件中说，已经在澳大利亚联邦法院提交诉讼，指控苹果iPhone、iPad侵犯七项专利，这些专利与无线通信标准有关。苹果曾宣称三星Galaxy手机平板侵犯专利，而三星试图使这些专利无效、撤消。

在手机与平板市场份额争夺上，苹果与三星卷入全球大战。苹果曾声称三星抄袭iPad和iPhone，在阻止三星Galaxy销售时，苹果在澳大利亚和德国获得部分成功。诉讼同时还提交到了美国和亚洲。

三星在声明中说：“三星在移动产业上拥有自豪的创新史，它不断投资于研发、设计和技术，以制造创新、前沿移动设备。”

http://tech.163.com/11/0917/08/7E528S96000915BD.html

飞儿

用户喜欢什么产品最重要。。。。。

yuba

原帖由 飞儿 于 2011-9-18 10:41 发表
用户喜欢什么产品最重要。。。。。

不能由着用户乱来

如果不是苹果成功地在多国禁止了三星产品的销售，还不知道有多少用户上当受骗呢

abbott1980

我们能买到更便宜更好的商品才是最重要的， 资本家的官司对我来说就是浮云！！！！

iami

icetea2007

原帖由 yuba 于 2011-9-18 10:50 发表


不能由着用户乱来

如果不是苹果成功地在多国禁止了三星产品的销售，还不知道有多少用户上当受骗呢

用户受什么骗了啊？
三星那款galaxy 10.1不是挺好的么？

ATO

3星雄起

黑山老妖

好像说三星的那几个专利不给力。

cangaru

But what did Apple really win?

The only patent upheld by the courts is patent 868, which addresses the scrolling between photo’s on a touchscreen (and how it bounces back after a short swipe). All other claims by Apple such as Samsung copying look & feel and duplicating swipe to unlock were deemed to not infringe. The LG Prada has the iPhone look & feel beat as it was released in 2007 before the iPhone. The lockscreen claims were covered with the relatively unknown Neonode N1m, which had the same lockscreen implementation back in 2005. The operating system likeness was defended citing the Nokia 7710, which had a grid style layout.

Samsung said at the end of the case it plans to remedy the gallery similarities through a Software update sent out over the air and it won’t affect any Samsung Galaxy sales in Europe.

So this could have been a bad move by Apple at the end of the day. It now means there is precedence set with their claims of others stealing likeness and could help to overturn other court cases between Apple and Android manufacturers in other countries. The judge also mentions that by having such a minimalist design, the iPad basically makes itself less viable for design protection.

It’s a miniscule victory for Apple, but could be a much larger victory for Android partners around the world

黑山老妖

这么看来苹果这次亏大了。

rumcoke

我的galaxy S 刚刚无原因自动reboot, 就看到这么个贴

yuba

为苹果没有阻止Galaxy S的销售感到遗憾

cangaru

原帖由 cangaru 于 2011-9-19 14:30 发表
But what did Apple really win?

The only patent upheld by the courts is patent 868, which addresses the scrolling between photo’s on a touchscreen (and how it bounces back after a short swipe). All o ...

link is here:
http://ausdroid.net/2011/08/25/samsung-loses-to-apple-or-does-it/

cangaru

原帖由 yuba 于 2011-9-19 16:11 发表
为苹果没有阻止Galaxy S的销售感到遗憾

为市场垄断者感到遗憾？

从苹果和三星的专利官司看，苹果只是别人发明创新的集成者，而不是原创者，苹果的成功完全要表扬苹果的市场部门而不是研发部门

rumcoke

原帖由 cangaru 于 2011-9-19 16:55 发表


为市场垄断者感到遗憾？

从苹果和三星的专利官司看，苹果只是别人发明创新的集成者，而不是原创者，苹果的成功完全要表扬苹果的市场部门而不是研发部门

我想yuba的意思是接着我那个贴的一个joke吧