|
|
此文章由 jeffygf 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeffygf 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 jeffygf 于 2017-10-14 20:41 编辑
我觉得这些可能都是子女移民带过来的父母, 子女需要带着他们走路顺便教一下就可以了.
还有就是澳洲法律也是可能判车有责的, 即使全部是行人责任... 这个是有判例的 我找link给你们看
A driver has a very high duty of care on the road to avoid injuring pedestrians. This duty of care includes driving in a safe and responsible manner, including anticipating pedestrians breaking road rules (especially if we're talking about jay-walking which happens extremely often) and avoiding pedestrians if one should suddenly walk onto the road.
Having said that, in exceptional cases, the driver may be able to claim contributory negligence while still bearing some responsibility:
Axiak v Ingram (NSW case): driver hit two young girls who ran out from behind a bus while driver's view of the children was completely blocked by the bus and there was little the driver could have done to avoid hitting the children. Court found contributory negligence of 50% (i.e. the children were 50% responsible for the accident)
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Glenn Swainson (QLD case): driver hit a man who was intoxicated and walking in the middle of the road with his back turned to on-coming traffic late at night. Court found contributory negligence of 60%
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a6385e3004de94513d9ffd
http://www.mondaq.com/australia/ ... t+for+motor+vehicle
|
|
贤惠的分寸 (2007-12-11) dorin 
楼主:CocoroCafe
发表于 2017-10-13 19:41
