|
此文章由 飞儿 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 飞儿 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 飞儿 于 2018-1-26 04:17 编辑
飞儿 发表于 2018-1-23 11:50 
1. 和非onsite manager的模式比(strata company+contractor),onsite manager的管理成本会高不少吗? ...
1. 和非onsite manager的模式比(strata company+contractor),onsite manager的管理成本会高不少吗?
--- not necessarily
2. 如果成本会高,那么bc会不会因为出于节约成本的目的而不续约,导致合同run out或者在即将run out的时候占据有利谈判地位讨价还价?虽然有office on title,但是都不需要onsite的模式了自然这个也就没意义了。
--- often an office is necessary for a building manager, regardless of being on site or not, in particular for a big building or complex.
3. resale的问题,悉尼那边登出来的卖MR的广告很少很少,一方面说明MR不多,另一方面也说明了市场对此模式反应一般,那么会不会给以后的resale带来问题?
--- a stable business with good return and potential is always popular
4. 悉尼的outside agent抢letting很凶,加之业主对MR的了解可能并不多,会不会导致letting大幅下降?
--- depending on your service
5. 据说悉尼买MR的时候需要所有业主面试并投票,如不通过则无法继续交易,另外即使有固定期限合同,业主仍有权利每年review工资和duties,是这样吗?
--- a MR buyer may not pass interview with strata committee.
duties can vary; salary won't be lower than current figure, usually goes up at CPI except review year (may go higher apart from CPI. ) I had 10% increase on top of CPI last year...
Having said the above, I reckon any business involves risks at different levels, that's why 'enterprise' means 'risks' in French (I heard about it from somewhere)... A mature business person shall take well calculated risks for their investments anyway.
(暂时没有更有经验的人出来, 我就抛砖引玉了)
|
|