新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 大结局,记录下跟邻居为了fence,plants走法律途径的过程 (2021-2-6) Jasmin365 · assignment---《伪香港人的屠刀》 (2005-1-22) lilytop
· 逃离日常 - 说说日本东北的两家温泉酒店 (全文完) (2019-5-2) violinlearner · 重读<洗澡>有感 (2005-6-11) DreamRedMansion
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 4285|回复: 13

[个人所得税] 股票税务问题 [复制链接]

发表于 2016-6-3 16:00 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 cdq0001 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 cdq0001 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
大家好,我记得股票交易税务里是不是有一条:在年中前把股票抛掉,然后再买回来,来增加capital loss的行为是不可以的?这个规则叫什么?
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-6-3 17:12 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 bw82312 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 bw82312 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
确定这种行为是不可以的吗 ? ?

发表于 2016-6-3 17:53 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 pgltaxation82 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 pgltaxation82 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
hi,
Hi,

you can do this.

you may mean short period share trades to get dividends and franking credits, which is not restricted. it is irrelevant to disposal of shares.

评分

参与人数 1积分 +3 收起 理由
cdq0001 + 3 感谢分享

查看全部评分

发表于 2016-6-3 17:55 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 pgltaxation82 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 pgltaxation82 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Hi,

Friday afternoon, please allow my mistake.

I mean short period share trades getting dividends and franking credits is restricted.

But there is no restrictions on disposal of shares, then purchase the same shares again.



发表于 2016-6-3 18:07 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jeff_lawsons 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeff_lawsons 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Yes, this will be a problem.

There is a strong risk that the ATO would seek to apply Part IVA to this arrangement. The ATO released a tax ruling in 2008 dealing with the potential application of the anti-avoidance rules to "wash sales"'. In broad term, this involves selling shares towards the end of the income year to trigger a capital loss and then buying back a similar parcel of shares soon afterwards.

The ATO confirms that Part IVA is likely to apply to arrangements like this where there appears to be an intention to trigger a capital loss in order to offset against capital gains made in the same year. Simply selling shares to trigger a capital loss is not necessarily a problem, but the ATO doesn't like it when the taxpayer then buys back the same asset(s) shortly afterwards.


Refer to TR2008/1:

https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/ ... 20081/NAT/ATO/00001

评分

参与人数 1积分 +3 收起 理由
cdq0001 + 3 感谢分享

查看全部评分

发表于 2016-6-3 18:12 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 anklos 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 anklos 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
jeff_lawsons 发表于 2016-6-3 17:07
Yes, this will be a problem.

There is a strong risk that the ATO would seek to apply Part IVA to th ...

挺奇怪的。

除非是数量很大,不然这个规矩挺莫名其妙的。

很多走技术流的经常卖出买入同一支股票很多次。
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-6-3 18:18 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jeff_lawsons 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeff_lawsons 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
anklos 发表于 2016-6-3 17:12
挺奇怪的。

除非是数量很大,不然这个规矩挺莫名其妙的。

ATO is targeting the wash sale transaction which has a taxation benefit in the form of:

(i) a capital loss; or

(ii) an allowable deduction,

As stated in the Ruling, the application of Part IVA to any particular wash sale arrangement depends on a careful weighing of all the relevant circumstances of the arrangement and the relative weight that should be attached to each of those circumstances.

However it is unlikely that Part IVA would apply to the situations where the taxpayer is to realise a capital gain to offset against the capital loss which has already been incurred. As the taxpayer has already suffered a economic loss (capital loss), they would be entitled to utilise the loss.

发表于 2016-6-3 19:18 来自手机 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 ozforever 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 ozforever 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
尼玛ato就是流氓。欺负散户。大机构打官司基本不输,a to不敢碰。竟拿我们散户开心。

发表于 2016-6-3 21:43 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 tu2011 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 tu2011 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
jeff_lawsons 发表于 2016-6-3 17:07
Yes, this will be a problem.

There is a strong risk that the ATO would seek to apply Part IVA to th ...

就是说比方先卖掉100000股,过了7月1日买回100001股或者99999股就不会有问题了?

发表于 2016-6-5 00:56 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 JohnnySu 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 JohnnySu 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
可以操作,一般情况下不会有问题。不用担心。

发表于 2016-6-6 10:48 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 bw82312 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 bw82312 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
JohnnySu 发表于 2016-6-4 23:56
可以操作,一般情况下不会有问题。不用担心。

谢谢!
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2016-6-6 12:40 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jeff_lawsons 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeff_lawsons 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
tu2011 发表于 2016-6-3 20:43
就是说比方先卖掉100000股,过了7月1日买回100001股或者99999股就不会有问题了? ...

Under a "wash sale" scheme, a tax benefit will be gained when a taxpayer has incurred a capital loss during a year of income where the capital loss would not have been incurred by the taxpayer during the year of income, if the scheme had not been entered into or carried out.

Therefore if your objective is to sell the shares to obtain a Capital Loss, and re-acquire the same or similar parcel in short time, continue your ownership interest in them, then it is likely to be a "wash sale" arrangement. The ATO may apply Part IVA to this kind of arrangement.

If the amount involved is material, consider carefully the application of the anti-avoidance provisions.

评分

参与人数 1积分 +5 收起 理由
tu2011 + 5 感谢分享

查看全部评分

发表于 2016-6-6 12:45 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 tu2011 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 tu2011 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
jeff_lawsons 发表于 2016-6-6 11:40
Under a "wash sale" scheme, a tax benefit will be gained when a taxpayer has incurred a capital lo ...

谢谢,再请问一句,相差多少才不是“similar parcel”?

发表于 2016-6-6 13:24 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 jeff_lawsons 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 jeff_lawsons 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
tu2011 发表于 2016-6-6 11:45
谢谢,再请问一句,相差多少才不是“similar parcel”?


The ATO does not mention whether there is a specific timeframe in which an investor can repurchase the shares back and be sure that the anti-avoidance rules won’t apply.

The ATO does not provide detail of what constitute “the same, or substantially the same assets” either.

TR 2008/1 (papra 13) sets out that the ATO will look at the following facts and circumstances surrounding the sale and repurchase to determine whether the dominant purpose of the sale was to generate a tax loss.

1.        The manner in which the scheme is carried out is not ordinary, is complicated or artificial or is explicable only by reference to the tax benefit obtained,
2.        The form of the scheme is the disposal of, or otherwise ending of, the taxpayer's beneficial ownership of or interest in, the asset
3.        The period over which the scheme is carried out is short, and the time at which the scheme was entered into is proximate to the derivation of a capital gain or assessable income, or the end of the income year.
4.        The result achieved by the scheme is the incurrence of a capital loss, and thus a reduction in income tax payable on any capital gains made by the taxpayer or the incurrence of an allowable deduction and, thus, a reduction in the income tax payable by the taxpayer, whether in that income year or a subsequent income year….

评分

参与人数 1积分 +5 收起 理由
tu2011 + 5 感谢分享

查看全部评分

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部