新足迹 › 论坛 › 澳洲生活区 › 工作学习 › CA/CPA学习和考试 › Rationale for the acquisition-CPA117

精华好帖回顾
· 澳洲(NSW)公立教育知识扫盲帖（2009年8月更新版） (2009-8-24) patrickzhu	· 参赛－好玩又好吃的功夫菜：拔丝土豆 (2007-2-19) Beily
· 7月30日HOLDEN COMMODORE SSV REDLINE VFII LS3 驾车感受 / 普通消费者点评，望本文对于有意购买SV 6 和ssv wag (2016-7-29) aa1017	· 最近比较活跃！Long Reef Beach, New South Wales 扫海归来！ (2014-3-5) 陈少

查看: 1307|回复: 8

Rationale for the acquisition-CPA117 [复制链接]

odds

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-26 22:33 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 odds 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 odds 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

看到online learning上的练习case，其中有要求做什么 rationale for acquisition. 可是这部分在教材中有涉及么？在什么地方呢？？感觉很陌生啊。

odds

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-26 23:05 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 odds 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 odds 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

啊？怎么没有人回答，是关于这方面没有么？

mixmixboy

光脚族

发表于 2012-4-27 02:25 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 mixmixboy 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 mixmixboy 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

case 3 ABL seems to be relevant to it, but I haven't prepared for case 3 yet.

xiaochahu

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-27 11:17 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 xiaochahu 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xiaochahu 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

There is no any information in the text book for rational acquisition.
Also, if they ezam this part, they have to give us more information about competitors.
but it's not in this case.

Do you agree?

By the way, do you agree with me about identifying acquisition of Hyrate belongs to New Product development?

mixmixboy

光脚族

发表于 2012-4-27 13:41 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 mixmixboy 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 mixmixboy 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

原帖由 xiaochahu 于 2012-4-27 10:17 发表
There is no any information in the text book for rational acquisition.
Also, if they ezam this part, they have to give us more information about competitors.
but it's not in this case.

Do you agree?
...

But it seems nothing has been "developed". They just took over an existing business...

xiaochahu

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-27 13:47 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 xiaochahu 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xiaochahu 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

Strategic option to chose for future, of course nothing hasn't been developed.
But what are they going to do is to develop new products for ABL?
I am not sure whether the market is new for ABL?

mixmixboy

光脚族

发表于 2012-4-27 15:20 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 mixmixboy 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 mixmixboy 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

原帖由 xiaochahu 于 2012-4-27 12:47 发表
Strategic option to chose for future, of course nothing hasn't been developed.
But what are they going to do is to develop new products for ABL?
I am not sure whether the market is new for ABL?

I think the market isn't new for them, because the consumers are the same (general public, schools, etc)

odds

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-27 20:09 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 odds 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 odds 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

原帖由 xiaochahu 于 2012-4-27 10:17 发表
There is no any information in the text book for rational acquisition.
Also, if they ezam this part, they have to give us more information about competitors.
but it's not in this case.

Do you agree?
...

恩我就怕到时候要来个并购分析，感觉这个并没有在教材中提到。因为case 3是可能会在考试中有补充材料。

我认为如果并购，应该是 product development. 新产品，原有市场。

xiaochahu

皮靴族

发表于 2012-4-27 20:10 |显示全部楼层

此文章由 xiaochahu 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xiaochahu 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整

They won't provide any new information in the exam.

返回列表

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册

精华好帖回顾

Rationale for the acquisition-CPA117 [复制链接]

发表回复