.

太阳高高挂

.

[ 本帖最后由 太阳高高挂 于 2011-7-21 23:53 编辑 ]

redhotliu

partnership不是separaterly legal entity. C和这个partnership 是雇佣关系，（net profit 可能只是incentives)。所以C不liable to any liabilties　或者　适当承担管理责任（a &b 有一定权利要求c赔偿），如果C breach duty of care而导致公司亏损的话。但是c 对债务没有任何责任

D是creditor，只是lender，不算partners，D有对债务赎回的权利。a & b有支付债务的义务。

因为partnership 里任何一个partner full liable to 3rd party，所以a完全liable对b以生意名义借的钱，即便这个钱进了b的个人口袋。

太阳高高挂

感谢楼上

但是，如果B 的借款 是超出生意用途的，是否应该算为：个人借贷。

Section 7 of partnership act   里的  7 Partner using credit of firm for private purposes
(1) Where one partner pledges the credit of a firm other than a firm that is an incorporated limited partnership for a purpose apparently not connected with the firm's ordinary course of business, the firm is not bound unless the partner is in fact specially authorised by the other partners; but this section does not affect any personal liability incurred by an individual partner.
(2) Where a general partner pledges the credit of a firm that is an incorporated limited partnership for a purpose apparently not connected with the firm's ordinary course of business, the firm is not bound unless the general partner is in fact specially authorised by the firm, but this section does not affect any personal liability incurred by an individual general partner.


附加： 出题的原话是：B approaches E on behalf of the business and borrows xxxx monty. B pays the money into her account.

这算是跟商业有关？ 算“经过授权”么？

redhotliu

没有提到授权。应该就默认为没有。那这笔钱和partnership没关系。只是b的personal debts.原题暗示，明显这笔钱直接归b个人所有了。这个是b的个人debts

但是现实的时候，这样的情况下明显要打官司才能决定。授权，verbal都可能算，甚至这笔钱可能是borrowing for b's dividence。

redhotliu

你在看organization law吧。很多年前，也为这类不上不下的问题苦恼过。现在继续苦恼CPA

太阳高高挂

;)  谢谢！