|
|
此文章由 gifox 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 gifox 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
我自己人微言轻，说得很多同志都不满意。那看看这位仁兄怎么说吧。
翻译一下要点。不过建议大家读原文，人家水平比我高多了，总该比我解释得清楚。
1 球是从10米以外射回来的，Harry Kewell应该有机会（把手）让开，这不是什么球打手。上届世界杯我们被（FIFA）告知：如果球从2-3 米以外很大力射过来，那么可以当作无意手球。但是Harry的距离是那的3到4倍。
2 不但如此，他的手臂还向球移动了一下。不管什么原因都好，当球射到Harry的手上的时候harry手的肌肉是绷紧的。这是应该被认为是故意手球的。
3 澳大利亚和Harry Kewell 都是不幸的，但是主裁判没有选择，只能是红牌+点球。
4 根据规则，当时Harry 在球门线上，那是个明显进球机会。所以一旦主裁判认定那是故意手球，就一定要把Harry驱逐出场。
5 Zdravko Kuzmanovic 和 Nemanja Vidic 都只拿黄牌是因为他们的情况没有一个算是“明显进球”机会。
6 不过Harry的案例可能会带来足球规则的改变，国际足联可能会考虑修改规则来减少这种3重处罚（点球+红牌+自动停赛).
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... l4sip-1225881956506
Harry Kewell's handball was a straight red card, says top Aussie referee
EFEREE Roberto Rosetti had "no choice" but to dismiss Harry Kewell for handball, according the Australian referee at the last two World Cups.
Mark Shield, who was Australia's leading official until he retired in 2008, insisted "you do not see a clearer case of handball on the goalline" after Kewell was dismissed for blocking a Ghanaian shot in the Socceroos' 1-1 draw yesterday.
Shield said there were two crucial factors that dictated both the award of a penalty and Kewell's expulsion after less than half an hour.
"The key fact is the shot was hit from so far away (roughly 10m) it gave Harry the chance to get out of the way - it couldn't be regarded as ball to hand," he said.
"At the last World Cup we were briefed that a ball hit hard from two or three metres away might not be viewed as intentional handball, but Harry was three or four times as far away.
"Not only that but he also makes a small but definite move towards the ball with his arm - for whatever reason, as the ball came to him Harry's arm stayed stiff and that's handball.
"It's so unfortunate that it was Harry Kewell and Australia, but Roberto had no option but to give the penalty and send him off."
According to the rules of the game, Kewell's position on the line meant it was an "obvious goalscoring opportunity" - ensuring he had to be dismissed once Rosetti ruled it a deliberate handball.
That's also why Zdravko Kuzmanovic and Nemanja Vidic only got yellow cards for their handballs in Serbia's two matches - neither situation was a clear goalscoring opportunity.
According to FIFA sources, referees at this World Cup were given specific guidelines to rule on whether a handball was deliberate.
They were told to look for the distance the ball had travelled from being kicked; the speed of the ball; and whether the hand or arm is in "an unnatural position". They also were told to consider the position of the arm relative to the body.
The FIFA sources also say footage on a refereeing presentation shown to the teams before the World Cup isn't directly comparable, despite the claims of Mark Schwarzer after the game, and certainly doesn't invalidate Kewell's red card.
It won't offer a scintilla of consolation to Kewell, but his case may prompt a change in the rules. The International Football Association Board, the body that oversees changes to the laws, was understood to be considering tackling the issue of the so-called "triple penalty" even before Kewell made it a cause celebre.
The lawmakers are vexed by the fact a penalty, a dismissal and a suspension all apply for one offence, and are believed to be considering options such as removing the suspension, or putting a cap of a yellow card on incidents where a penalty is awarded.
[ 本帖最后由 gifox 于 2010-6-20 19:15 编辑 ] |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
小儿女记事系列15--说一说澳洲的小学教育（117楼更新，补充几则花朵小学生活片段） (2009-12-7) 清凉 
看电影了解英国历史 (2024-6-1) 酸菜小鱼1212 
发表于 2010-6-20 19:46
发表于 2010-6-20 20:13
