|
|
此文章由 爬山虎 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 爬山虎 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
粗看了一下， 说的是有些做了评估的， 但是没有卖房子的人， 是觉得交易成本太高， 所以，要么装修， 要么出租， 要么晚些再卖。
但是如果降印花税， 或者取消的话， 那么卖的人就多得多（几乎翻倍）。
不做判断， 纯粹罗列市场数据。
Where have all the listings gone?
The number of properties listed for sale has been extremely low over the past two years. This comes despite strong population growth and housing stock increasing by around 350,000 dwellings over the period. A lack of listings has been a major contributor to strong property price growth.
In 2016, the total number of properties listed for sale across the country was 8.9% lower than seen in 2015. This reduced the availability and choice for those looking to purchase a property. As such the number of sales transactions in 2016 was 9.2% lower than in 2015. Low listing volumes at a time when interest rates have driven buyer demand higher has fueled price growth.
Background
In order to identify why listing numbers have fallen, LJ Hooker recently surveyed home owners to
understand their motivations and experiences with the appraisal and listing process. The survey,
conducted in Q1 2017, received more than 2,700 responses from Australian property owners.
More than 70% of all respondents had their property appraised, by a real estate agent, over the 12 months prior to completing the survey. This is important because home owners, generally, ask an agent to come and appraise their property when they are well advanced in their plans to list and sell their property.
However, 60% of those that received an appraisal did not follow through to list their property for sale.
Indicating that there are some major roadblocks stopping people from transacting.
Survey results
What are the reason for not listing?
According to the survey conducted by LJ Hooker, The number one reason for not listing is the cost of change. This means the transactional costs involved in selling and then buying another property are to high. The largest cost incurred here is government stamp duty which adds significant cost to purchasing another property. 35% of respondents didn't list their property for sale because they could not find another property to buy or rent to move into.
So what next?
For those that decided not to list, they were asked what they planned, or did, with their property.
• 57% said they had decided to renovate their property instead of selling.
• 29% they will hold on to the property for now and list at a later date.
• 14% indicated they would rent their property out.
What was the reason for not listing your property?
What do you plan to do with your property?
Would changing stamp duty help?
Just under half of respondents stated that transaction costs were holding them back from listing, selling and buying another property. So, we decided to ask if government stamp duty was an inhibitor to listing their property.
First, we asked if simply lowering stamp duty would change the home-owners mind. We found that 51% of those that didn’t list, after receiving an appraisal, would do so if stamp duty was lower.
Secondly, we asked what they would do if stamp duty was abolished altogether and found that 61% of those that didn’t list, after receiving an appraisal, would do so if stamp duty was abolished altogether.
Conclusion
Existing dwellings make up the majority of homes across Australia's property markets. While increasing the supply of newly built homes is important to grow the total stock base, there needs to be incentives, options and policy in place to ensure that people who want, or need, to sell can do so easily and without costly restrictions.Governments at all levels need to work together to ensure that tax, superannuation and planning regulations are integrated and accommodative to ensure they don't inhibit or deter the supply of new or existing properties from coming onto the market for sale. Any policy change that helps increase supply will likely have a positive impact on slowing property price growth by satisfying the demand. |
|
庆祝新足迹一周年生日快乐！小豹子dorin倾情演唱祝兴《你最珍贵》 (2009-1-13) dorin 
发表于 2017-6-28 17:30
