|
|
此文章由 michael10 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 michael10 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
this is the pest report, why so many high risk ?
1.1. The conditions in the roof void of the property created a high risk for timber pests to attack the property.
1.4.1.5. There were insulation, some torn sarkings, high moisture contents, poor ventilation, cracked structures, skylight, loose electrical wires, thick dust, timber pests, ants, watermarks, water leakage and blemishes in the roof void. The above may conceal possible damages. The skillion roof was inaccessible. There were timber structures to conceal the roof void. The roof void was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. Furthermore, there were some torn sarkings, which allow water to leak through to the roof void. There was visible evidence of timber pests attack in the roof void. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the roof void to cause damages. In addition to the above, the roof void of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pests attack.
2.4. The edges of the roof void were inaccessible.
2.5. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the edges of the roof void to cause damages.
3.1. The conditions in the interior of the property created a high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
3.4.3.5. There were high moisture contents and poor ventilation on the ceiling, walls and floor of the bathrooms, toilets, kitchen, laundry and bedrooms, which would create a high risk to attract timber pests. The roof, the walls and the floor of the bathrooms, the toilets, the kitchen and the laundry created a very high risk for timber pests to attack the property. The moisture contents of southerly internal walls were high and the ventilation was poor. The floor was covered by timber, carpet and tiles. In the kitchen, there were stored goods; which obstructed the inspection. The interior of the property was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. The wall tiles in the bathrooms should be extended to ceiling height to minimize the risk of timber pest attack. Furthermore, regrouting for bathrooms was visible to prevent water to leak through the damaged grouts. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the interior to cause damages. In addition to the above, the interior of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pests attack.
4.1. The conditions in the subfloor created a very high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
4.4.4.5. In the subfloor, there were high moisture contents, poor ventilation, inadequate ant caps, timber formworks, cracked structures, scattered loose timbers, stored goods, leaves, thick dust, timber pests, dead termites, ants, watermarks and blemishes. Some new timber structures were installed in the subfloor. There were movements in the brickwork at the front and rear. There were timber structures to conceal the subfloor. The subfloor was also partly concealed or partly inaccessible. The above may conceal possible damages and create a high risk to attract timber pest to attack the property. Furthermore, there was visible evidence of timber pest attack in the subfloor. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the subfloor to cause damages. In addition to the above, the subfloor of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
5.1. The conditions in the exterior of the property created a high risk for timber pest to attack the property.
5.3. Visible evidence of fungi working and damages were found in the fascia boards, eaves and exterior timbers of the property at the time of inspection. The fascia boards, eaves and exterior timbers should be inspected regularly to check for fungi attack.
5.5. On the exterior of the property, loose timbers on ground needed to be removed. There was visible evidence of timber pests attack in the exterior loose timbers. Timber pests, dead termites and ants appeared in the exterior of the property. There was mortar erosion and fretted walls, which would allow timber pest to get through. Some damp proof courses were visible on walls. The gutters and the down pipes needed to be cleaned up to enable rainwater to flow smoothly. Furthermore, whirl birds were recommended to install on the top of the roof. In addition to the above, the exterior of the property should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
6.5. The fence should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
7.5. On the floor, there were cracks, which would allow timber pest to get through. Furthermore, the pavers were uneven on floor. In addition to the above, the floor should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest attack.
8.5.9.5. There was no Termite Protection Notice.
10.5. Visible evidence of timber pests working and damages were found in the rotten tree stumps at the time of inspection. Furthermore, the tree stumps must be removed to minimize the risk of termite attack. In addition to the above, the rotten tree stumps were to be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
12.5. The landscape needed to be improved and the vegetations were too close to walls, which may conceal damages of timber pest attack. In addition to the above, the landscape should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
14.4.14.5. The carport needed to be touched up. There were cracks in the carport. Furthermore, in the carport, there were stored goods, which obstructed the inspection. The carport was partly concealed or partly inaccessible. In addition to the above, the carport should be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
17.5. The vegetations were to be inspected regularly to check for timber pest.
18.5. There were some torn sarkings in the property. When raining, the water would leak through between the roof tiles, resulting in watermarks on the ceiling and walls. In addition to the above, there were watermarks in the property.
20.5. Visible evidence of timber pests working and damages were found in the property at the time of inspection. The termites may cause damages in concealed or inaccessible areas in the property. There was a high risk for termites to attack the property because the working distance of termites to attack property was about fifty meters. Furthermore, the moisture contents were high, the ventilation was poor, the subfloor conditions were poor, the tree stumps were rotten, and there were many trees around the property. The high moisture contents and poor ventilation of the property would attract termites to attack the property. Please note that the skillion roof was inaccessible. The roof void, the subfloor, the carport, the interior and the exterior of the property were partly concealed or partly inaccessible. There were cracks, which would allow timber pest to get through. In addition to the above, there was no sunlight on southerly walls; there was a high risk to attract termites. Termites, borers or fungi may be present in the concealed or inaccessible areas of the property to cause damages. A quarterly termite report and annual pest control services were a must. The installation of a Termite Protection Program was a must. The expected protection period of certain termiticides are eight years subject to at least quarterly termite reports.
|
|