跟shopping mall有点纠纷,他们一开始承认过失,这部分我都有written evidence,最后过了两个月根据他们的霸王条款说不赔了。 妥妥的negligent maintenance所以想去small claim court告他们,但是查了下信息,发现shopping mall的哪个entity/entities是被告方比较复杂,不知道哪位同学学法律能给点建议? 这是我找到entity信息:Ashfield Mall (“the Centre”) of 260A Liverpool Road, Ashfield, NSW 2131 is owned by Mintus Investments 4 Pty Ltd ACN 672 740 644 (in its capacity as trustee for The Retail Investment Trust 8 ABN 16 414 053 661) and operated by Mintus Pty Ltd. Mintus Investments 4 Pty Ltd应该是Mintus Pty Ltd建得一个子公司。 问题来了: 1. Letter of Demand是给ABN (The Trustee for The Retail Investment Trust 8, ABN 16 414 053 661) 还是给ACN (Mintus Investments 4 Pty Ltd, ACN 672 740 644),还是两个都给? 2. Mintus Pty Ltd(也就是总公司)需要增列为被告么? 3. 同question 1,statement of claim的被告是ABN,ACN还是两个都作为被告? |