|
此文章由 cshen 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 cshen 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
google了一下, 至少在NSW:
http://www.businesslawyer.com.au/tree_disputes_between_neighbours.htm
What principles has the Court lain down to refuse to make an order? To date, the Court has formulated two tree dispute principles, as follows –
The tree was there first – if the tree was already growing when the structure was built or if it was self sown rather than planted, it may mean that no compensation can be recovered by an owner whose structure has been damaged by tree branches or roots from a tree growing on a neighbour’s property.
Ordinary maintenance issues – if an urban tree drops leaves, flowers, fruit, seeds or small deadwood, no order will be made to prune or remove the tree.
No order to pay compensation for repair works or damage to an owner’s structures will be made unless the owner has warned the neighbour and the neighbour fails to prune or remove the tree to prevent further damage – a neighbour is not responsible for damage caused before the warning was given.
我的理解, 针对楼主的case, 如果下面2个任何一个情况属实, 楼主应该不用
付任何责任:
(1) 楼主家的树比被破坏的邻居的水管早在那里的话, 楼主没有责任
(2)楼主的邻居在这个水管被破坏之前没有正式警告楼主可能会发生的破坏,楼主没有责任。
Disclaimer: 我不是律师, 我也不居住在NSW.
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|