|
此文章由 3IX37 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 3IX37 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 3IX37 于 2013-10-22 20:56 编辑
xinxin119 发表于 2013-10-21 15:45 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d46/d4d469e5ff88ee3d52ac5f4e4e5d1780c6756876" alt=""
i always like your question but really hate to answer or find an answer
the answer is rather straight forward.
For this type of transfer arrangements, the most common one is transfer payment for provision of annual leave or long service leaves, and there is a specific statute rule for it.
section 26-10(2) of ITAA97 specifies that transfer payment for leave provision is deductible in hands of transferor and section 15-5 of ITAA97 treats this transfer payment as assessable at the hand of transferee.
Although there is no statute rule for other provision transfer payments, the spirit of law should apply the same way. Furthermore, as i previously elaborated, the payment obligation has been crystallised and the taxing period can be presently referable to the year when the transfer payment is taken place, the transfer payment therefore should be deductible to the transferor and assessable to the transferee.
BTW Big 4 is often overrated, the peer debating with me was a former big4 tax manager, however he clearly didn't appreciated this statute rule for these type of transfer payment. (he was specifically debating with me that the transfer payment for leave provision is not deductible, while the statute states otherwise).
However, the next thought i am having now when i am typing this, I am thinking whether any CGT implication should be considered, if provision transfer payments are not specified as an ordinary income under statue.
Not likely i know, but if it would....
would it be a CGT event A1 or other event? would the underlying provision account be a CGT asset? or would the obligation to pay be a CGT asset?
I think i am going sleep on this tonight:)
|
|