新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 2020-2022 云旅到成行 泡汤与红叶 伊香保 四万 草津 小布施 上林 上越 妙高 松本 上高地 河口湖 箱根(全文完) (2022-11-18) peanut · 心情纪录,我们处在衰退中------加息暂停了,买房吗?(118楼更新) (2008-10-16) 北风
· 种萝卜 (2015-7-12) qld · 没有被隔离, 所以就。。。。。。玩啊! (2009-5-31) olympus
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 1262|回复: 0

FRM p. 7.18 exmaple 7.2 embedded option [复制链接]

发表于 2012-12-31 14:56 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 clusterapple 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 clusterapple 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
1) 請問什麼是 share future movements in the currency on a 50:50 basis ?
2) why Exportalot Ltd should reject the offer ? 我看了答案也不明白
3) counterparty give up in order to achieve the 50 per cent cover level 是什麼意思

exportalot Ltd and importalot Ltd each have a USD 20 million exposure one year from today.
the spot rate is AUD/USD0.9000 and the forward outright rate is AUD/USD0.8500. Both companies are approached by
their counterparties in the contracts and are offered a repricing clause which shares future movements in the currency
on a 50:50 basis.  Both companies were intending to cover 50 per cents of their exposures anyway, so both analyse the offer.
which company should reject this offer ?
Exportalot Ltd should reject the offer as explained below
if it covers 50 per cent of its exposure on the financial markets, Exportalot locks in USD10 000 000/0,8500 = AUD11 764 706.
this compares to the sport rate on the USD 10 million of 10/0.9000 = AUD11 111 111, a difference of AUD653595
(which is what the counterparty would have to give up in order to achieve the 50 per cent cover level).

the difference would probaly cover the corporate financial risk manager's salary for a year or two
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部