|
|
此文章由 bulaohu 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 bulaohu 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
没啥了不起的新功能，就是Linux他爹不耐烦sub-version都长到40了，决定从此改名，2.6.40将成为 3.0.0
整整15年，比browser的版本升级慢多了 
下面是Linus的原话
"Yay! Let the bikeshed painting discussions about version numbering begin (or at least re-start).
I decided to just bite the bullet, and call the next version 3.0. It will get released close enough to the 20-year mark, which is excuse enough for me, although honestly, the real reason is just that I can no longe rcomfortably count as high as 40.
The whole renumbering was discussed at last years Kernel Summit, and there was a plan to take it up this year too. But let's face it - what's the point of being in charge if you can't pick the bike shed color without holding a referendum on it? So I'm just going all alpha-male, and just renumbering it. You'll like it.
Now, my alpha-maleness sadly does not actually extend to all the scripts and Makefile rules, so the kernel is fighting back, and is calling itself 3.0.0-rc1. We'll have the usual 6-7 weeks to wrestle it into submission, and get scripts etc cleaned up, and the final release should be just "3.0". The -stable team can use the third number for their versioning.
So what are the big changes?
NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. Sure, we have the usual two thirds driver changes, and a lot of random fixes, but the point is that 3.0 is *just* about renumbering, we are very much *not* doing a KDE-4 or a Gnome-3 here. No breakage, no special scary new features, nothing at all like that. We've been doing time-based releases for many years now, this is in no way about features. If you want an excuse for the renumbering, you really should look at the time-based one ("20 years") instead.
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_s ... -30-006-41-NW-LF-KN
[ 本帖最后由 bulaohu 于 2011-5-31 12:06 编辑 ] |
|
变迁 (2010-8-9) tld128 
发表于 2011-5-31 02:14
