|
此文章由 davidmouse 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 davidmouse 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
eguan88 发表于 2019-6-19 10:53 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d46/d4d469e5ff88ee3d52ac5f4e4e5d1780c6756876" alt=""
7 review vs 77 review 这个什么销量差距
你的两次发言不是自相矛盾吗?一方面说怀疑这个是托评论的,一方面又说评论那么少。扪心自问下,如果你去找托,只找7个?而且跨度从04年到19年?
这种本来就是小众产品,而且美国市场有大量本土造的大牌,你那个是中国产的,其实77的评价也算是小众之一了。关键是评价里面差评不少,足可见问题。而且那些评论很精准,细节很多,一看就知道是什么货色。
比如:
June 18, 2017
Size: 82mmVerified Purchase
This appears to be a very nice spotting scope, but you need to be mindful of the reviews. This scope is made in China, so quality is not what one would expect. Vanguard touts ED glass along with other features, which is nice and makes one think that they are getting a quality product. Not so with the one I purchased. It didn't take very long for the Coarse focus knob to lock up, which made it very difficult to turn. Keep in mind that this was brand new, right out of the box. The fine focus knob seemed to be OK, but I wondered how long before it too was going to lock up. Yes it is packed with features backed with a full lifetime warranty, however if the one I purchased had issues right out of the box, it makes me wonder how long it is going to last. My advice is to avoid this entire product line, and stick to the name brand scopes like Leupold, Celestron, etc.
这个很好的说明了你所推崇的所谓ED镜片是什么。
还有这位老兄直接做了个测试对比,对比的对象是自己的60美元的镜子,结果大跌眼镜,成像几乎一样,所以给了差评。
还有很多类似故事。
以我玩枪喵的经验,15-45这种三倍镜,成像质量应该是最容易的那种。换句话说,做的好是应该的,做的不好就是垃圾。而且15倍的起步,找目标根本找不到,等找到了目标已经跑了。所以打猎的枪瞄通常都是2-3倍起步。
最后既然是精买版,我推荐个更好的,不至于让你咬牙切齿,对吧? |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册
x
|