离婚后是否夫妻不买房的一方也失去1ST home grant？

rain_0

有个问题 请指教 ：
如果夫妻双方都享受 first home buyer benefit  ， 其中一方要先买房子 但是 房产权只属于买房一方， 另一方是否必须出让

自己的firsthome benefit 给对方的
房子？ 如果这样做了 将来 如果对方提出离婚 另一方是否没有产权的同时 也失去了firsthomebenefit？

连续到的stampduty 的特权 都一并失去了？

现在　买房得一方在强迫　没买房得一方签订一个application form and lodgement guide --first home plus exemption or

concession from duty.
不知道　是否因该签字。关于这方面的法律条文规定　也看得很含糊。http://www.turkslegal.com.au/upl ... amp_Duty_Scheme.pdf[/url]

　帮指教下　，　谢谢。

rain_0

请问那个first home plus exemption or concession from duty application form and lodgement guide, 如果签字了 那个房产又不属于你的， 是不是将来对方把房子卖了 你还要帮对方付贷款？

hwll

两口子这么计较还不如现在就离婚, 先分别买房了再说..谁也不吃亏

澳洲桉树

离婚后永久失去了FHOG

urskathy

离婚后 如果房子判给另外一方, 没有房产的这一方仍然可享受FHB BENEFIT.

kr2000

原帖由 urskathy 于 2009-6-3 16:41 发表
离婚后 如果房子判给另外一方, 没有房产的这一方仍然可享受FHB BENEFIT.

真的吗?
以前不知道这个

pengwang

原帖由 urskathy 于 3/6/2009 16:41 发表
离婚后 如果房子判给另外一方, 没有房产的这一方仍然可享受FHB BENEFIT.

这个说法可靠么？ FHOG申请表上说Applicants and their spouse/partner must not: have occupied, for a continuous period of at least six months, a residential property in which they acquired a relevant interest on or after 1 July 2000 anywhere in Australia. 如果离婚前夫妻双方住在这个房子里，那么都是有relevant interest，是不是就违反了这一条呢？等待正解。

urskathy

我上面的解释是以前听到律师解答的时候的印象;
被大家这么一说 倒是感觉不塌实了...
还是向律师咨询吧~
如果正好 有机会我也去问问律师~ 到时候来汇报~

休

举个实例吧,老公的名字买屋,老婆的名字买店,离婚后,老公分得屋,老婆分得店和车,财产分配都报上法庭,由法庭盖章确认.老婆离婚后买屋,享受首次置业津贴.

澳洲桉树

“举个实例吧,老公的名字买屋,老婆的名字买店,离婚后,老公分得屋,老婆分得店和车,财产分配都报上法庭,由法庭盖章确认.老婆离婚后买屋,享受首次置业津贴.”
离婚后老婆买屋申请FHOG被拒。

redsummer

出个馊主意，
先把婚离了再买，
买了后复婚，
不就没这个担心了，

Artcore

From QLD First Home Owner Grant Bill 2000 (I assume NSW/VIC should have something similar)

In 1997, Mr Z purchases a home. His wife, Mrs Z, does not have an interest in the home. The couple later divorce, and the home is sold in July
2000. In July 2001 Mrs Z marries Mr A, and Mr A purchases a home, in which they will both live. Mr A has never previously owned a home. Subject
to compliance with other eligibility criteria, as neither Mr A or his spouse Mrs Z owned a residential property prior to 1 July 2000 or a principal
residence after that date, a FHOGS grant will be payable.


Under the Act, the fact that an applicant's spouse has previously obtained a first home owner grant, or that the applicant's spouse owned a residential property prior to 1 July 2000 or acquired a home after that date will mean that the applicant is ineligible for a grant. By excluding spouses who are legally married but no longer cohabiting with the applicant, unless the applicant's spouse is also a party to the application, an applicant will not be ineligible because the status of their spouse. This approach reflects that in some cases it would be unduly onerous to preclude a grant to an applicant on the basis of the status of their spouse if, although legally married, the applicant and their spouse are in the process of divorce or, or although not having sought a divorce they no longer live or intend to live as a couple.

HakunaMatata

原帖由 redsummer 于 2009-6-4 09:14 发表
出个馊主意，
先把婚离了再买，
买了后复婚，
不就没这个担心了，

听着好乱

idog8818

为了那7000块,至于嘛...

peng

就是, 犯不上啊, 夫妻和睦幸福才是最重要的.

Treadstone

飘过～～
高难的问题，等着看正解！

icewant

很难的问题

stockcomments.c

看你申请FHOG时的签名。
签了名就等于你以后没机会了。