爸爸妈妈的探亲签证被拒签了！急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急

onlyshino

爸爸妈妈在澳洲呆了一年以后回中国，马上申请了又一年的探亲签证，没想到不是没给1年，而是直接被拒签！
原因是说
1.我爸妈有移民倾向，
事实是爸妈有提交房产证和养老金证明什么的，为什么还认为他们有移民倾向？
2. 我爸妈在澳洲没有公民或是PR的直系亲属
这点完全是officer脑袋秀斗，我们明明提交了PR的VISA公证件，JP都签字的，为什么她要说谎？

我们现在怎么办？本来计划爸爸妈妈下个星期来的，机票都买了，而且我们下周要出差，本来计划是爸爸妈妈在家带宝宝的。。。怎么办？

可以投诉吗？怎么办怎么办？
请大家帮忙出出主意，不胜感激！！！！

下面是拒签信。

refer to your application for the Subclass 676-Tourist visa for Australia, This visa is for persons who wish to visit or remain in Australia for up to twelve months.  


After careful consideration of all the information you have provided, I am satisfied that you meet all the criteria for the grant of a Tourist Visa as set out in the Migration Regulations 1994. You’re application is therefore refused.  


In reaching my decision, I have assessed your application against the relevant legislation contained in the Migration Act 1958, the Migration Regulation 1994 and Procedural Advice Manual 3. I have also considered the Minister for Citizenship and Multicultural; Affairs’ Policy direction No 36 of 2005 which refers to matters I should consider in the testing whether or not a visa applicant intends a genuine visit and assessing the adequate funds criterion.  


Criteria for Subclass 676 Tourist Visa


It may assist you to understand the decision taken on your application if I provide you with information on the legislative criteria and the decision-making process. There are various legal requirements that must be met by all applicants before a Tourist Visa for Australia can be granted. As the decision-maker I must be satisfied that you meet Australia’s health and character requirements, have access to adequate funds for your support during the period of your proposed visit, and that your expressed intention only to visit Australia is genuine. The likelihood of your overstaying, seeking to remain in Australia or applying for another temporary visa after your arrival in Australia, are also matters that have to be assessed.  


Reason for Visa Refusal  


This section details the requirement you did not meet


You did not satisfy Subclauses 676.221(2)(a), which reads that:

The applicant satisfies the Minister that the expressed intension of the applicant only to visit Australia is genuine.


As per the Ministerial Direction No.36 , the purpose of a visitor visa is for short term visits and not intended for migration or to maintain long term temporary residence on shore. Therefore, you current use of the 676 visa does meet with Ministerial Direction N0.36.  


As a result of the above, I can not be satisfied that a genuine visit is intended and therefore must refuse your application.



Review Rights.


You have no stated in your application that you have at least one close relative (parent, spouse, child, brother or sister) in Australia who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia. A decision to refuse to grant a visa application made outside Australia where the applicant did not include the particulars of a close relative who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia in the application is not a decision that can be reviewed by the Migration Review Tribunal (section 338 of the Migration Act 1958).


Please note that no further assessment of this application can be taken at this office. If you still wish to visit Australia, it is open to you to lodge a new application if you feel that you can provide sufficient evidence that you meet the criteria for the grant of a visitor visa. I encourage you to carefully consider this option before lodging a new application, as there is no refund of an application charge just because an application is not successful. Without prejudice to the outcome of any new application, experience shows that if a new application does not contain any new information, it is unlikely that the decision would be any different from any previous application.  


Anne Kirwan

Position Number 9304

jungle

原帖由 onlyshino 于 2009-5-3 17:38 发表
As per the Ministerial Direction No.36 , the purpose of a visitor visa is for short term visits and not intended for migration or to maintain long term temporary residence on shore. Therefore, you current use of the 676 visa does meet with Ministerial Direction N0.36.  

我认为LZ没有仔细看清楚拒签信里面的这一条：
旅行签证的目的应该是短期的探访，而不是移民 或者保持长期临时居住在澳洲

所以移民局根本没说你父母一定是有移民倾向啊。这个拒签的原因，我认为显然就是因为LZ父母刚刚回去然后又马上申请，所以被认为企图通过反复申请676签证而达到在澳洲长期居留的目的。申诉翻案我认为希望不大。。。因为情况确实就是这样的啊。

紫月怡雪

'爸爸妈妈在澳洲呆了一年以后回中国，马上申请了又一年的探亲签证'
我觉得问题是不是就是出在这个‘马上’上，好像刚回国不能立刻又申请的，要隔一段时间。

jl162401

还是取决于签证官的心情吧，听说过很多回去马上申请的例子，不过保险起见，还是隔6个月以上比较好。

You have no stated in your application that you have at least one close relative (parent, spouse, child, brother or sister) in Australia who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia. A decision to refuse to grant a visa application made outside Australia where the applicant did not include the particulars of a close relative who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia in the application is not a decision that can be reviewed by the Migration Review Tribunal

不甚理解，为啥说申请人没有任何亲属是PR或者公民，基于这个原因，这个申请不能被review,如果想拿到VISA，需要重新申请。

这个地方有点问题，写信问一下吧，为啥说申请人没有任何亲属是PR或者公民，说不定有一点点转机

托姆

以前有帖子讨论过的，不能马上申请，要过一段合理的时间再申请。

老杏

原帖由 onlyshino 于 2009-5-3 17:38 发表
You have no stated in your application that you have at least one close relative (parent, spouse, child, brother or sister) in Australia who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia. A decision to refuse to grant a visa application made outside Australia where the applicant did not include the particulars of a close relative who is a citizen or permanent resident of Australia in the application is not a decision that can be reviewed by the Migration Review Tribunal (section 338 of the Migration Act 1958). ...

这是说你在申请中没有提到有亲戚或自己是澳洲PR或公民。

Auburn

原帖由 jungle 于 2009-5-3 17:59 发表


我认为LZ没有仔细看清楚拒签信里面的这一条：
旅行签证的目的应该是短期的探访，而不是移民 或者保持长期临时居住在澳洲

所以移民局根本没说你父母一定是有移民倾向啊。这个拒签的原因，我认为显然就是因为L ...

ls 说的对,lz父母被拒的原因是因为回国后马上申请的,如果在国内呆几个月再申请,就不会被拒了

fiji

隔一年就保险了