|
此文章由 waterforce 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 waterforce 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本来想继续在这个帖子下面说的,奈何毕竟是新闻区不好发帖,所以放在我爱我家这边~~
传送门如下:
http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/f ... p;extra=&page=1
我后来又搜索了一下,发现其实对于日落条款,购房者有胜诉的例子:
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a635173004de94513d89ad
Lianghong Mei - 不知道是梁红梅还是梅梁红,总之是胜诉了
可以参考审判:
7 - Clause 3.1(b) gives either party to the contract the right to rescind "If this ha s not happened". It was submitted that it could hardly be supposed that the purchaser should lose the right of rescission in clause 3.1(b) if the vendor breached the obligation to use all reasonable endeavours.
8 - Printed clause 28 is, it was submitted, an example of a clause in the contract where the parties intended to make compliance with an obligation to use reasonable endeavours a pre-condition to the exercise of a right of rescission and differentiated between the position of the party who had the obligation and the party who did not.
9 - Thus, it was submitted, clause 28.2 requires the vendor to "do everything necessary to have the plan registered within 6 months" and clause 28.3.1 stipulates that if the plan is not registered within that time and in that manner, the purchaser can rescind while clause 28.3.2 stipulates that the vendor can rescind, but only if the vendor has complied with clause 28.2.
也就是说,在落日条款当中有28.2 - 这才应当是攻辩的焦点 - "do everything necessary"
欢迎探讨…… |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|