|
此文章由 limit-2010 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 limit-2010 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
其实是一个英文题哈:
http://english.stackexchange.com ... r-x-times-more-than
This is indeed a classic. The question has been asked many times around the web, and there appear to be two schools: one that agrees with you, and one that thinks both constructions are OK and takes both to mean 15 sweets. I think those people are nuts, but hey they might be the majority. I say, why use a construction that is either illogical or ambiguous when you have a perfectly good alternative? But language isn't logical, especially not idiom, so I suppose I cannot call my argument objective. I think "3 times more" as 15 sweets total is acceptable to most people, though I'd never use it. You will even see it in newspapers. The exact same problem exists in Dutch, with the same sides to choose between.
就是说理论上来讲你的理解是对的(我也是这样认为),但是真的就有人认为两者是一样的意思,
所以不得不被迫接受这个说法了 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|