新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· READ <DOWN UNDER> BY BILL BRYSON (首次英文写作的尝试) (2006-11-9) 东食西宿 · 2017六月西澳Kimberley之行 (2017-6-18) Walle
· 不吃不知道,一吃吓一跳。 (2009-5-24) 第一名 · 因为春天——宏图细绘周日的brunch party(顺便跟大家分享下凝凝是怎么在家准备午餐会滴)蛋糕方子补完 (2011-9-19) feicunzic
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 870|回复: 4

Y5一道数学题: 'x times as many' vs 'x times more than' [复制链接]

发表于 2015-2-18 12:00 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 峨嵋高手 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 峨嵋高手 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
有道题目是这样的:

If one square has three times the perimeter of another, how much larger is its area?

给的答案是9 times.但我觉得应该是8 times, 因为问的是how much 'larger', 不是how many times the?

请问我的理解对吗?
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2015-2-18 12:07 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 limit-2010 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 limit-2010 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
其实是一个英文题哈:

http://english.stackexchange.com ... r-x-times-more-than

This is indeed a classic. The question has been asked many times around the web, and there appear to be two schools: one that agrees with you, and one that thinks both constructions are OK and takes both to mean 15 sweets. I think those people are nuts, but hey they might be the majority. I say, why use a construction that is either illogical or ambiguous when you have a perfectly good alternative? But language isn't logical, especially not idiom, so I suppose I cannot call my argument objective. I think "3 times more" as 15 sweets total is acceptable to most people, though I'd never use it. You will even see it in newspapers. The exact same problem exists in Dutch, with the same sides to choose between.


就是说理论上来讲你的理解是对的(我也是这样认为),但是真的就有人认为两者是一样的意思,
所以不得不被迫接受这个说法了

评分

参与人数 1积分 +2 收起 理由
峨嵋高手 + 2 感谢分享

查看全部评分

发表于 2015-2-18 13:50 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 峨嵋高手 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 峨嵋高手 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
limit-2010 发表于 2015-2-18 13:07
其实是一个英文题哈:

http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/7894/x-times-as-many-as-or-x-times- ...

谢谢答复...

这样看来你的签名似乎更make sense了.

发表于 2015-2-18 14:09 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 pancak 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 pancak 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
同意!

发表于 2015-2-18 14:26 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 wenwenmum 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 wenwenmum 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
should be 8

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部