|
|
此文章由 指南针 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 指南针 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
hgaox 发表于 2014-2-3 22:55 
呵呵,欧盟委员会的出版物很明确,它们实质等同于传统作物,你的定论就是有害从何而来,依据是什么?现在 ...
澳洲对转基因政策太松。看你贴的链接上面写着FSANZ自己也做不了什么独立的试验,试验结果还是靠推销种子的公司Monsanto等利益集团来做,卖种子的人自己做的实验来证明所卖种子的安全性,你再根据他的结论作判断也不可靠。如此松懈的转基因政策,能让人放心吗?我们必须反对,至少得更谨慎。还有就是必须呼吁全面标注,让消费者有知情权。
Does FSANZ commission its own scientific studies?
No. It is the responsibility of companies that have developed GM foods to demonstrate the safety of that food and to supply FSANZ with the raw data from scientific studies to prove this. The data must be obtained using sound scientific methods and be collected according to strict quality control criteria. This procedure is no different to that used for new chemicals and drugs and is standard practice for standards-setting agencies like FSANZ internationally. FSANZ experts review the scientific information and form their own conclusions from the results of the studies. We can, and do, request companies to undertake additional studies, where necessary. |
|