|
|
发表于 2018-12-16 15:42
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 stellawan 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 stellawan 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
猫儿不笨 发表于 2018-12-16 15:24
原文你可以继续找
稍微用脑想一下就知道了，作案时间范围越长，对控方越有利，这就是前三审检方坚持作案 ...
Activity in the Boundary Road Premises After the Lin Family Returned on 17 July 2009 (CCS [17])
Henry Lin chatted online to a friend on MSN until the friend signed out at about 11.40 pm that night. Computer records show that the computer was turned off at 00:01:38.
A Dark Night (CCS [18])
The night of 17 July and the early hours of 18 July 2009 were dark. At 2.00 am, there was virtually no moon (moon rise was at 02:43 and moon set at 12:46). At its peak in the sky, only 23% of the moon was visible. The Boundary Road premises were likely in darkness as the electricity switch was off.
The Manner, Order and Time of Death of the Deceased Persons (CCS [18]-[24])
The Crown case is that the killer necessarily had knowledge of the layout of the home in order to be able to successfully navigate it in darkness.
All of the deceased were found dead in their respective bedrooms. All were on or near their beds. All had obvious and significant wounds to their head and face.
The Crown case is that there is an overwhelming inference that each deceased was quickly incapacitated. The concentration of blunt force injury to the head and face, together with asphyxial injuries, indicate that there may have been action taken to prevent the deceased from vocalising. The Crown contends that there is an available inference that all of the deceased were attacked whilst they were asleep, rather than earlier in the evening.
There was no disturbance of any items in the adults’ rooms to suggest a struggle whilst they were awake. There were no items out of place down stairs.
In relation to the time of the deaths, the Crown relies upon circumstantial evidence as to when the deceased were last seen alive. Henry finished his chat session on the computer in his bedroom at 11.40 pm and the computer was turned off shortly after midnight. Min Lin did not attend the newsagency early on Saturday morning. The Crown contends that this period includes the time period when the Accused had an opportunity to commit the crimes, that is after 2.00 am.
A next-door neighbour, Janelle Wraith, of 53 Boundary Road, was awake until 1.00 am. She described herself as a light sleeper and she did not hear anything that night. The Crown contends that there is an available inference that there was very little noise during the attack as the deceased were attacked unawares in their beds. It is said that the logical inference is that the deaths occurred in the early hours of the morning.
Blood spatter and DNA evidence was considered by Detective Sergeant Harkins, an expert in blood stain analysis. The Crown contends that this evidence indicates the order of the deaths. It is said to illustrate that the killer had prior knowledge regarding which bedrooms various people were sleeping in and knew which to target first, in order to minimise the risk of opposition.
If the lights were off and the killer made a check once inside the house, the Crown contends that this would have been difficult to discern without running the risk of waking the occupants.
The Crown contends that the person most likely to offer significant resistance, Min Lin, was killed first, together with his wife, Lily Lin. The killer would also have known he first picked the room with two adults and to disable those people quickly. The Crown contends that it is extremely likely that the severe injuries to the heads of the deceased would have been readily incapacitating.
The Crown submits that the other adult in the house, Irene Lin, was attacked next. She represented the next highest threat.
This was followed by the attack on the two boys who would have been the easiest to subdue. Even they were killed in their bedroom, indicating that the murder of the three adults did not awaken them in time to exit their bedrooms.
The Crown contends that the lack of blood evidence in or near Ms AB’s room, from either shoe impressions or blood smears on the door handles, provides an available inference that the killer had knowledge that Ms AB was away. The Crown says that for a person outside the family, with no prior knowledge of the layout of the bedrooms to go into them to see who was there, would have posed an unacceptable risk of waking the occupants and raising the risk of serious opposition. According to the Crown, the absence of this makes it highly unlikely that the assailant needed to explore the house.
There were impressions from only one type of shoe (other than those from police boots consistent with having been deposited during the discovery of the bodies and initial investigation of the crime scene).
你所说的死亡时间界定为何是2:00am之后，我所看到的庭审文件表述得很清晰，所以你所谓的谢2点关机，我是没有在哪个庭审文件上看到过，如果确实有，麻烦你也贴一下。说实话，如果不参考无法取证的“据说”，案子其实很清晰. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
VCE 高考生的学习经验 4楼 （考场如战场，也要讲天时地利人和）填坑完毕 (2013-3-21) 冬迹之樱 
漫 话 西 厢 (2005-1-3) leeshine 
楼主:satellite0
