|
|
发表于 2017-2-26 08:35
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 悉尼小波霸 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 悉尼小波霸 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 悉尼小波霸 于 2017-2-26 11:13 编辑
jhsun3 发表于 2017-2-24 13:07
工會這麼大反應不是因為從2倍被削減到1.5倍。。。大多數還是會繼續把持週末的班次，而且最多也就少數那麼 ...
这篇左派smh的报道没有说的是：此事的起因是工党党魁Bill Shorten当年引入的Fair Work Act，包括了要review周末加班工资。而这个做决定的Fair Work Commission是当年Julia Gillard一手搞起的，里面的官员都是工党指派的。结果大出所料。杯具了！！
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... 752d2618c7828f4a02b
Even though the employer groups didn’t achieve the objective of aligning Saturday and Sunday penalty rates and there is the delay to contend with, they won’t be complaining about the decision. After all, Bill Shorten had said during the election campaign last year that he was absolutely sure the Fair Work Commission wouldn’t touch penalty rates.
And given the Opposition Leader’s involvement with the introduction of the Fair Work Act, including related amendments, under which terms this review of penalty rates was conducted, many of us wondered at the time whether he knew something that we didn’t.
Don’t forget most of the appointments to the FWC were made by the recent Labor governments, of which Shorten was part. When Shorten was employment minister, he even went to the trouble of amending the Fair Work Act to add that modern awards should include: “The need to provide additional remuneration for: employees working overtime; or employees working unsocial, irregular or unpredictable hours; or employees working on weekends or public holidays; or employees working shifts.” This is covered in section 134 (da).
|
|
澳洲生活Q&A－买房 (2005-1-3) astina 
楼主:BOC
发表于 2017-2-24 09:25
