|
发表于 2025-4-1 12:07
来自手机
|显示全部楼层
此文章由 ozkids2011 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 ozkids2011 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
就事论事,这里有两方面的法律,具体执行还是要看警察如何判断是否冒犯行为。
(1)
It is generally possible to take photographs in a public place without asking permission. This extends to taking photographs of buildings, sites and people. In a case involving street surveillance photography used as evidence in a criminal case, an Australian judge stated “a person, in our society, does not have a right not to be photographed.” (R v Sotheren (2001) NSWSC 204 (20 March 2001) [25]. Dowd J.)
From https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/street-photographers-rights/#_ftn1
(2)
In NSW, the Police media policy is clear: “Police may have powers to prevent a member of the public from taking photographs or filming, or confiscate equipment or deleting images only in certain limited circumstances.” These are words that need to be read carefully, especially the words ‘only’ and ‘limited circumstances’. Those circumstances are: “Where they have been given special powers under anti-terrorism legislation; or where taking photographs or filming images amounts to offensive conduct under the Summary Offences Act 1988”.
From https://www.capturemag.com.au/advice/know-you-rights-shooting-in-public#:~:text=In%20NSW%2C%20the%20Police%20media,words%20'only'%20and%20'limited |
|