|
|
此文章由 Evo 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Evo 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
逆鳞龍 发表于 2021-2-8 20:41 
没有这说法,以后有决定性证据仍然可以逮捕,起诉,关键后续补充的证据可以确定其罪名。 ...
你说的我知道 。 wiki 搜double jeopardy
In Victoria on 21 December 2011, legislation was passed allowing new trials where there is "fresh and compelling DNA evidence, where the person acquitted subsequently admits to the crime, or where it becomes clear that key witnesses have given false evidence".[12] However, retrial applications could only be made for serious offences such as murder, manslaughter, arson causing death, serious drug offences and aggravated forms of rape and armed robbery.[18]
再次起诉可以,但是情况限制非常多。请注意限制词是不止只有fresh,还有compelling DNA evidence,另外说被告人要认罪(admits to the crime)
对这个案子而言在失踪者生死不知的情况下就拿circumstantial evidences起诉谋杀罪,极大的可能性会被辩护律师说:警方连张菊女士的生死都无法证明,这是恶意起诉。检方只能撤诉,说不好还得陪被告方律师费。
我们看一下Ristevski杀妻案,跟本案有很多类似情节。杀妻案中尸体在8个月后被找到,连死因都无法确定,不可能用上述再次起诉的法则。
|
|