中国媒体发文针对澳大利亚的间谍主张

DUCATI

powerbuilder 发表于 2020-6-29 12:34
email。。。 手机都不能用，还用email

您是认真的？没感觉到我前面都是开玩笑的？
您真的认为此间谍把情报写在笔记本上要人肉带回去的吗？
这间谍是不是没身份证，在国内开展起工作相当为难？去买不到实名的SIM卡，注册不了支付宝，开不了银行账号？
这绝对违反 work place healthy and safety，澳洲情报部门居然得让他自己去申请这些个账号，这间谍回来绝对能去告雇主的。

虞宅与美丽

powerbuilder 发表于 2020-6-29 12:19
现在基本情况就是只有80年之前出生的，小时候仰望美帝的，思维定势，还肯为西方卖命

90后00后，本身在中 ...

如果没有微信支付宝，恐怕连饭都吃不上吧……7-11三文治要揣两个。

Hetbert

第一张图是啥米啊，是墙里的摄像头么？

好像是高级货啊，看起来比宾馆偷拍用的针孔摄像头块头大多了，带无线模块吧？

yelleft

环球时报? 老胡中肯!

1212

这。。。图二的东西除了压在地图上的不知道是什么，其他东西家里都有啊。。。做间谍的装备差不多也齐了？

qwplqy

我敢肯定他是上海人

wanziqianhong

每个正常国家都有情报机构和人员。关键是刻意拿出来渲染XX威胁论，真是做BZ立牌坊，够恶心不要脸。
搞得自己就是一个像virgin一样纯洁的国家，是不断被敌对国家刺探的受害者。

formatc

Lucif3r 发表于 2020-6-29 09:40
别瞎猜，就是光脚新来的。

我信你了 名字头像都和十年前差不多的 我相信轮回也相信转世

澳洲蓑笠翁

wanziqianhong 发表于 2020-6-29 13:31
每个正常国家都有情报机构和人员。关键是刻意拿出来渲染XX威胁论，真是做BZ立牌坊，够恶心不要脸。
搞得自 ...

被抓就是技不如人， 没啥可说的。
看交换一点什么回来吧。

澳洲蓑笠翁

DUCATI 发表于 2020-6-29 12:39
您是认真的？没感觉到我前面都是开玩笑的？
您真的认为此间谍把情报写在笔记本上要人肉带回去的吗？
这间 ...

你这么心智高的， 不去做特工真的屈才了。

快乐朋友

统战1

快乐朋友

统战2

快乐朋友

统战3

快乐朋友

统战4

快乐朋友

统战5

全部有间谍潜质

多难兴邦

DUCATI 发表于 2020-6-29 12:05
我就是可笑，公布些随便大街上都能找的到的东西来作为间谍证据。
同时现在几乎没人用纸张的地图了，特别 ...

这是从来没看过地图吗？地图两面，一面详细图，一面主要交通图。拿这个来说不是间谍有点那啥了吧。另外，人家就算真抓到间谍，会在媒体上把证据全部摆出来？王特工的“证据”都没上媒体呢，只说了几句语焉不详的所谓口供，连一个实物都没有，哪怕是一张地图，对吧？还有，间谍就不能用小本本了？这是谁规定的，万一人家是个老头呢。人家可以写写自己想记录的东西，比如TODO list之类的，不行超市清单也可以啊，谁规定必须要把情报写到上面带回去的？

快乐朋友

澳大利亚上海同乡会会长张智森先生

bbc007

DUCATI 发表于 2020-6-29 09:42
环球时报还公布了一些“间谍材料”，包括一个指南针，一个USB，一个笔记本，一个口罩，手套和一张上海地图 ...

不明白间谍为何要戴口罩，用指南针，还用地图？现在都手机地图了，澳洲的间谍也太老土了吧？还是环球时报没有料可暴了

bbc007

koala8848 发表于 2020-6-29 13:29
书生偷书也叫偷？那是借！
民主国家搞间谍那叫谍？那是为了自由！ ...

就像地下党是为了革命胜利一样

xiyah

真真假假谁知道呢

australiaed

DUCATI 发表于 2020-6-29 09:42
环球时报还公布了一些“间谍材料”，包括一个指南针，一个USB，一个笔记本，一个口罩，手套和一张上海地图 ...

可以推断此举就是故意在逗澳洲？

autulip

好吧……

ozone

好想看看澳洲政府敢不敢有勇气公然否认对中国搞过间谍活动，说别的都是瞎扯。

ozone

汉奸们又登场了，表演机会来了。

cantonese

Report: United States Bugged China’s Embassy In Australia


澳洲人老实啊！

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013 ... controversy/5079148

The Chinese Embassy bugging controversy
In 1995 the ABC and the Sydney Morning Herald revealed a highly sophisticated joint US-Australian operation to bug the newly constructed Chinese Embassy in Canberra.

Australian intelligence officers and NSA technicians had covertly installed an elaborate system of fibre optic bugging devices throughout the embassy during its construction in the late 1980s.

Within the 'Five Eyes' club this operation was quietly proclaimed as an electronic intelligence gathering triumph – but some spies had reservations.

Former Australian intelligence officers alleged that Australians had taken all the risks, yet once listening devices were operational, the US assumed control of the bugging and selectively withheld diplomatic and economic intelligence gleaned from the operation.

The former Australian spies claimed that in withholding information, the US gained a competitive edge over Australia in trade deals with China.

By early 1995, the operation and the allegations of the disgruntled officers were common knowledge in Canberra’s defence, political and media communities. It seemed everyone was in on the secret except the public.

Despite the operation being clearly compromised by this time – the Australian government went to extraordinary lengths to prevent further embarrassing public disclosure of the bugging and the equally damaging allegations of mistrust within the highly valued UKUSA intelligence sharing club.

So sensitive was this spying mission that foreign minister Gareth Evans issued a suppression order via a Federal Court injunction, blocking publication of the story by the Sydney Morning Herald, resulting in a five week legal battle with the newspaper's lawyers.

Any further public leaks were also swiftly suppressed. After briefly discussing this freedom-of-speech tussle on talk back radio, broadcaster Alan Jones and Sydney radio station 2UE were also served with an injunction.  

On May 25, 1995, an ABC TV News lead story on the bugging and suppression controversy was pulled, 30 minutes before broadcast by managing director Brian Johns who feared a breach of a 'D Notice', a voluntary, but by then largely dormant agreement between media and government not to publish sensitive intelligence information - an informal arrangement that dated back to the Second World War.

The item was pulled despite ABC legal advice that broadcast did not breach the law.

The inevitable "ABC pulls ASIO item" headlines led the next morning's newspapers. The following night, despite legal threats from the Federal Attorney General’s Department, the ABC report finally aired and the suppression order on the Sydney Morning Herald was lifted, allowing publication of the original story.

With the D Notice system clearly ineffective, then foreign minister senator Evans publicly threatened to jail journalists involved in any future intelligence exposes. Laws were toughened to prevent primary or secondary disclosure of sensitive intelligence information, regardless of motivation or public interest.

Today, the digital information age transcends national boundaries, and such tactics in suppressing public disclosure have been rendered largely redundant, but the Chinese Embassy story highlighted other highly sensitive elements yet to be explored in the analysis of the Snowden revelations.

To what extent do members of the UKUSA 'Five Eyes' intelligence club benefit from this electronic eavesdropping treasure trove when negotiating international trade deals worth billions of dollars?  

Do major national corporations deemed by government to be working in 'the national interest' get access – directly or indirectly - to this inside information when doing business overseas? And if they do – who selects the recipients?

And what happens to the intelligence when the 'Five Eyes' members are in direct economic competition with each other? Do friends fall out?

As the Snowden-NSA document treasure trove just keeps on giving, no doubt a few anxious 'Five Eyes' security officials will be recalling the old spy industry adage that "there's no such thing as a friendly foreign intelligence agency, just the intelligence agencies of friendly countries".

Posted 7 NovNovember 2013, updated 8 NovNovember 2013

shingotroy

环球时报的文章至少有图，有时间点，有细节，澳媒至今公布出点啥了？

ozone

shingotroy 发表于 2020-6-29 15:52
环球时报的文章至少有图，有时间点，有细节，澳媒至今公布出点啥了？

没办法否认就只能装瞎作哑了，这样的事还少吗？ 早就没皮没脸了。

ozone

整天叫嚷中国渗透，干涉澳洲政治。 澳洲干涉渗透中国都无数年了，当然还有别的国家。

danielweng

DUCATI 发表于 2020-6-29 09:42
环球时报还公布了一些“间谍材料”，包括一个指南针，一个USB，一个笔记本，一个口罩，手套和一张上海地图 ...

说实话，你这水平，估计认为指南针是指南用的。

Z80CPU

怎么还有指南针？王大间谍笑了, 这编故事水平连我都不如!