|
|
此文章由 Poweregg 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Poweregg 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Jovani 发表于 2020-4-16 09:32 
恶法吧得人心的,即使你是租客,暂时经济困难,也大多不会想这样对待自己的房东,最多要求延缓付租,以后免 ...
有些租客是无产者无畏,或者觉得吃房东天经地义
中介号召大家写信,有租客直接骂
You’re an absolute disgrace to humanity. Where is YOUR SENSE OF CARE to those lease fortunate. SHAME ON YOU LANDLORDS, ALL OF YOU. IT’S ALL ABOUT MONEY MONEY MONEY TO YOU.
We the tenants, have rights too, we work hard to pay our rent our bills, feed our families, for you it comes, on a silver plate. Disgraceful, shameless people. We are in a crisis, the whole world is drowning, not just you stupid people, with no brains, nor heart. Millions are out of work and on top of that, you are concerned about your pockets. Love to see you rent those homes when the tenants are gone, and at the prices you are asking. WAKE UP all you Landlords, for years, and years you have pressed your foot into tenants throats, making sure your rent is never one day late, blood suckers to the end. It’s about time the simply hard working man, has some rights too. Your a disgrace for humanity, some of us can’t even put enough food on the table for our children, nor pay bills because we are out of work. Your in this COVID-19 crisis too.
中介回
No where is anyone saying tenant protections aren’t warranted. The concern is that the current proposal eliminates any burden of proof that covid-19 hardship even exists. Of even greater concern is the proposal that land-lords incur the full cost of any such hardship (proven or otherwise) in spite of a legally binding lease agreement (or future lease agreement). The federal government has called for a moratorium on evictions, but this proposal is effectively a moratorium on paying rent for any reason. Section 51 of our constitution states that fair compensation must be paid to any property holder who has had their property acquired by the state which is effectively what this amounts to. This proposal isn’t just ill-conceived, I believe it’s illegal. That’s not to say tenant protections shouldn’t exist, but these cannot be unconstitutional. |
|